Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26861 - 26870 of 44730 for part.
Search results 26861 - 26870 of 44730 for part.
CA Blank Order
have been credited against the six-month jail term he received for the felony, which also was part
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99721 - 2013-07-23
have been credited against the six-month jail term he received for the felony, which also was part
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99721 - 2013-07-23
State v. Kevin L. Sendejo
robbery was an extremely serious offense based, in part, on the amount of prison exposure the legislature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4067 - 2005-03-31
robbery was an extremely serious offense based, in part, on the amount of prison exposure the legislature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4067 - 2005-03-31
United Lodges of S.N.P.J. v. City of Brookfield
an ex parte order enjoining enforcement of the June 9 order.[2] The parties subsequently stipulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8665 - 2005-03-31
an ex parte order enjoining enforcement of the June 9 order.[2] The parties subsequently stipulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8665 - 2005-03-31
95 SC 725 Leann Stoddard v. Richard Berg
by conceding that his estimate of $4000 was “purely speculation on [his] part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11529 - 2005-03-31
by conceding that his estimate of $4000 was “purely speculation on [his] part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11529 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence of three years’ confinement per count. As part of the plea agreement, nine additional counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72963 - 2014-09-15
sentence of three years’ confinement per count. As part of the plea agreement, nine additional counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72963 - 2014-09-15
Helena Fedders v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
as a defendant to the Stearnses’ cross-claim. Fedders then filed an amended complaint that, for the most part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15629 - 2005-03-31
as a defendant to the Stearnses’ cross-claim. Fedders then filed an amended complaint that, for the most part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15629 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jessie White
of the witnesses. See State v. Toy, 125 Wis.2d 216, 222, 371 N.W.2d 386, 389 (Ct. App. 1985). Here, part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9936 - 2017-09-19
of the witnesses. See State v. Toy, 125 Wis.2d 216, 222, 371 N.W.2d 386, 389 (Ct. App. 1985). Here, part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9936 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
is not a defendant in this action and the motion relies on items that are not part of the circuit court record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31966 - 2014-09-15
is not a defendant in this action and the motion relies on items that are not part of the circuit court record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31966 - 2014-09-15
State v. Charles Newman
pleas of no contest to three misdemeanors[2] as a part of a plea agreement with the State.[3] Newman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6304 - 2005-03-31
pleas of no contest to three misdemeanors[2] as a part of a plea agreement with the State.[3] Newman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6304 - 2005-03-31
Georgia L. Bertschinger v. Kim Wenger
in the form of forgiving Wenger’s rental debt was based in part on applying the statute of limitations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19418 - 2005-08-29
in the form of forgiving Wenger’s rental debt was based in part on applying the statute of limitations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19418 - 2005-08-29