Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26861 - 26870 of 83414 for simple case search.
Search results 26861 - 26870 of 83414 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 948.075(1r) and the application of “a computerized communication system” to the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79461 - 2014-09-15
. § 948.075(1r) and the application of “a computerized communication system” to the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79461 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
) (2013-14).[1] He now appeals from the judgments of conviction in the two cases, which have been
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140327 - 2015-04-19
) (2013-14).[1] He now appeals from the judgments of conviction in the two cases, which have been
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140327 - 2015-04-19
COURT OF APPEALS
) and the application of “a computerized communication system” to the facts of this case, which are questions of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79461 - 2012-03-14
) and the application of “a computerized communication system” to the facts of this case, which are questions of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79461 - 2012-03-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
was not assigned to the case and the order was based on the false premise that Emily had been discharged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29416 - 2014-09-15
was not assigned to the case and the order was based on the false premise that Emily had been discharged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29416 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Bruce N. Brown
. No. 2003AP3252 3 The facts or data in the particular case upon which an expert bases an opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20456 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2003AP3252 3 The facts or data in the particular case upon which an expert bases an opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20456 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
, because he was being held for revocation of his extended supervision on a different case at that time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105735 - 2013-12-12
, because he was being held for revocation of his extended supervision on a different case at that time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105735 - 2013-12-12
[PDF]
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Lucille S.
discovery, several pretrial conferences and Lucille’s waiver of the time limits, the cases were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3921 - 2017-09-20
discovery, several pretrial conferences and Lucille’s waiver of the time limits, the cases were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3921 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Brown County v. Rock County
in a CHIPS proceeding to "transfer venue" of the case to Brown County. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9618 - 2017-09-19
in a CHIPS proceeding to "transfer venue" of the case to Brown County. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9618 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence because “there is no statute or case law that provides that a sentencing court can impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113843 - 2005-03-31
sentence because “there is no statute or case law that provides that a sentencing court can impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113843 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was not assigned to the case and the order was based on the false premise that Emily had been discharged. Emily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29416 - 2007-06-18
was not assigned to the case and the order was based on the false premise that Emily had been discharged. Emily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29416 - 2007-06-18