Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26871 - 26880 of 44395 for name change.
Search results 26871 - 26880 of 44395 for name change.
2010 WI APP 48
have erred” in blaming Asmus, but that does not change its conclusion that the request was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48275 - 2010-04-25
have erred” in blaming Asmus, but that does not change its conclusion that the request was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48275 - 2010-04-25
COURT OF APPEALS
its discretion when it concluded the new evidence would not change the verdicts. See State v. Plude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38747 - 2009-08-03
its discretion when it concluded the new evidence would not change the verdicts. See State v. Plude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38747 - 2009-08-03
[PDF]
State v. Jamie D. Jardine
of these factors when imposing the sentences. Therefore, changes in these factors do not frustrate the purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3725 - 2017-09-19
of these factors when imposing the sentences. Therefore, changes in these factors do not frustrate the purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3725 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
attorney for a change of venue, and that this attorney told him that the State said at some unspecified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=461589 - 2021-12-09
attorney for a change of venue, and that this attorney told him that the State said at some unspecified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=461589 - 2021-12-09
State v. James R. Brownson
improperly exercised its discretion when it concluded that the new evidence was not likely to change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11911 - 2005-03-31
improperly exercised its discretion when it concluded that the new evidence was not likely to change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11911 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is currently in federal prison for a different conviction does not change our analysis. See Bell, 122 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138236 - 2017-09-21
is currently in federal prison for a different conviction does not change our analysis. See Bell, 122 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138236 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Brian Todd Pheil
to Pheil. We doubt that use of the extra terms “mere presence” would have changed the verdict. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14632 - 2017-09-21
to Pheil. We doubt that use of the extra terms “mere presence” would have changed the verdict. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14632 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the Connecticut witnesses’ testimony would have changed the outcome of the case. Accordingly, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44481 - 2014-09-15
that the Connecticut witnesses’ testimony would have changed the outcome of the case. Accordingly, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44481 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to change his address, having a friend monitor his mail, etc.). Reviewing LIRC’s decisions, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96334 - 2014-09-15
to change his address, having a friend monitor his mail, etc.). Reviewing LIRC’s decisions, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96334 - 2014-09-15
Elaine Friedman v. Cedrick Pennington
evolved and, according to some of the trial testimony, changed during the years the Penningtons rented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12609 - 2005-03-31
evolved and, according to some of the trial testimony, changed during the years the Penningtons rented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12609 - 2005-03-31