Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26881 - 26890 of 59277 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 26881 - 26890 of 59277 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the grounds for the ineffectiveness claim “have [been] shown to lack merit,” negating the need
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210464 - 2018-04-04
that the grounds for the ineffectiveness claim “have [been] shown to lack merit,” negating the need
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210464 - 2018-04-04
Nicholas R. Ball v. Cooperative Educational Service Agency No. 6
answer. CESA’s answer did not specifically claim immunity under § 893.80(4), Stats., which provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11459 - 2005-03-31
answer. CESA’s answer did not specifically claim immunity under § 893.80(4), Stats., which provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11459 - 2005-03-31
State v. David W. Oakley
and a condition of probation. He also alleges that a new factor warrants resentencing. We reject these claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16335 - 2005-03-31
and a condition of probation. He also alleges that a new factor warrants resentencing. We reject these claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16335 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Peterson
or a felony. Peterson failed to preserve his claim of error. Peterson’s position on appeal is in direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7178 - 2017-09-20
or a felony. Peterson failed to preserve his claim of error. Peterson’s position on appeal is in direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7178 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158627 - 2017-09-21
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158627 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to terminate Nina’s parental rights. Accordingly, there is no arguable merit to claim there is insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990110 - 2025-07-30
to terminate Nina’s parental rights. Accordingly, there is no arguable merit to claim there is insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990110 - 2025-07-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
unconstitutional, his violation of that statute should not have been read in at sentencing. Locke also claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804071 - 2024-05-21
unconstitutional, his violation of that statute should not have been read in at sentencing. Locke also claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804071 - 2024-05-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
whether there is arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court erred by denying Curet’s motions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=755515 - 2024-01-31
whether there is arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court erred by denying Curet’s motions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=755515 - 2024-01-31
COURT OF APPEALS
north of the roadway and claims the right to use the roadway for access to the southern part of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33539 - 2008-07-29
north of the roadway and claims the right to use the roadway for access to the southern part of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33539 - 2008-07-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Upon review, we conclude that Canady could pursue an arguably meritorious claim to clarify
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372274 - 2021-05-27
a response. Upon review, we conclude that Canady could pursue an arguably meritorious claim to clarify
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372274 - 2021-05-27