Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26881 - 26890 of 29713 for des.
Search results 26881 - 26890 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
WI App 62
. STAT. § 66.0413. ¶11 Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195412 - 2018-08-23
. STAT. § 66.0413. ¶11 Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195412 - 2018-08-23
[PDF]
State v. Steven A. Avery
we review de novo. See Bembenek, 140 Wis.2d at 252, 409 N.W.2d at 434. We begin by noting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11594 - 2017-09-19
we review de novo. See Bembenek, 140 Wis.2d at 252, 409 N.W.2d at 434. We begin by noting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11594 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Armand Linzmeyer v. D.J. Forcey
at 433. This is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 427. ¶25 In determining whether
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16464 - 2017-09-21
at 433. This is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 427. ¶25 In determining whether
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16464 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Antonio A. Scott
and prejudicial are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Moats, 156 Wis.2d 74, 101
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14300 - 2014-09-15
and prejudicial are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Moats, 156 Wis.2d 74, 101
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14300 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court upholds factual findings unless clearly erroneous, but it reviews de novo whether those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456986 - 2021-11-30
court upholds factual findings unless clearly erroneous, but it reviews de novo whether those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456986 - 2021-11-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
agreement is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72447 - 2014-09-15
agreement is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72447 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
supports protective placement are questions of law, which we review de novo.” Therese B., 267 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=598321 - 2022-12-06
supports protective placement are questions of law, which we review de novo.” Therese B., 267 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=598321 - 2022-12-06
HSBC Realty Credit Corporation v. City of Glendale
review de novo. State v. Waushara County Bd. of Adjustment, 2004 WI 56, ¶14, 271 Wis. 2d 547, 679 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25766 - 2006-08-29
review de novo. State v. Waushara County Bd. of Adjustment, 2004 WI 56, ¶14, 271 Wis. 2d 547, 679 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25766 - 2006-08-29
[PDF]
WI APP 34
a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. The purpose of statutory interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93174 - 2014-09-15
a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. The purpose of statutory interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93174 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statutory interpretation, our review is de novo.” DOR v. Microsoft Corp., 2019 WI App 62, ¶13, 389 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682403 - 2023-07-25
statutory interpretation, our review is de novo.” DOR v. Microsoft Corp., 2019 WI App 62, ¶13, 389 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682403 - 2023-07-25