Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26891 - 26900 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 26891 - 26900 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
NOTICE
with a prohibited alcohol concentration. Nienke claims the trial court erred by denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26788 - 2014-09-15
with a prohibited alcohol concentration. Nienke claims the trial court erred by denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26788 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the grounds for the ineffectiveness claim “have [been] shown to lack merit,” negating the need
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210464 - 2018-04-04
that the grounds for the ineffectiveness claim “have [been] shown to lack merit,” negating the need
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210464 - 2018-04-04
COURT OF APPEALS
by State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 181-182, 517 N.W.2d 157, 162 (1994) (postconviction claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35943 - 2009-03-23
by State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 181-182, 517 N.W.2d 157, 162 (1994) (postconviction claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35943 - 2009-03-23
Nicholas R. Ball v. Cooperative Educational Service Agency No. 6
answer. CESA’s answer did not specifically claim immunity under § 893.80(4), Stats., which provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11459 - 2005-03-31
answer. CESA’s answer did not specifically claim immunity under § 893.80(4), Stats., which provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11459 - 2005-03-31
State v. David W. Oakley
and a condition of probation. He also alleges that a new factor warrants resentencing. We reject these claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16335 - 2005-03-31
and a condition of probation. He also alleges that a new factor warrants resentencing. We reject these claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16335 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Brian L. Read v. Village of Fox Point
the estate, right, title, interest and claims of [Calumet Land Co.], for the use and enjoyment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8238 - 2017-09-19
the estate, right, title, interest and claims of [Calumet Land Co.], for the use and enjoyment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8238 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Peterson
or a felony. Peterson failed to preserve his claim of error. Peterson’s position on appeal is in direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7178 - 2017-09-20
or a felony. Peterson failed to preserve his claim of error. Peterson’s position on appeal is in direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7178 - 2017-09-20
Mark Edwards Dietrich v. Connie Wildo
vacant and their past actions are null and void. Dietrich appeals the judgment denying his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13227 - 2005-03-31
vacant and their past actions are null and void. Dietrich appeals the judgment denying his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13227 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158627 - 2017-09-21
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158627 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to terminate Nina’s parental rights. Accordingly, there is no arguable merit to claim there is insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990110 - 2025-07-30
to terminate Nina’s parental rights. Accordingly, there is no arguable merit to claim there is insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990110 - 2025-07-30