Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26891 - 26900 of 29713 for des.
Search results 26891 - 26900 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statutory interpretation, our review is de novo.” DOR v. Microsoft Corp., 2019 WI App 62, ¶13, 389 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682403 - 2023-07-25
statutory interpretation, our review is de novo.” DOR v. Microsoft Corp., 2019 WI App 62, ¶13, 389 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682403 - 2023-07-25
Kristine Neiman v. American National Property and Casualty Company
de novo. Chappy v. LIRC, 136 Wis. 2d 172, 184, 401 N.W.2d 568 (1987). ¶9 A rational basis test
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17553 - 2005-03-31
de novo. Chappy v. LIRC, 136 Wis. 2d 172, 184, 401 N.W.2d 568 (1987). ¶9 A rational basis test
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17553 - 2005-03-31
Lake City Corporation v. City of Mequon
N.W.2d 519 (1996). This court reviews questions of law de novo, without giving deference
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16970 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 519 (1996). This court reviews questions of law de novo, without giving deference
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16970 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Zan Morgan
, which we review de novo based on the facts as found by the trial court. State v. Mosher, 221 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4281 - 2017-09-19
, which we review de novo based on the facts as found by the trial court. State v. Mosher, 221 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4281 - 2017-09-19
2006 WI 131
or regulation and the interpretation of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. Hillhaven Corp
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27514 - 2006-12-18
or regulation and the interpretation of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. Hillhaven Corp
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27514 - 2006-12-18
[PDF]
Robert A. Benkoski v. Mark A. Flood
interpretation that we review de novo. ¶25 Flood argues that the trial court erred in doubling Benkoski’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2585 - 2017-09-19
interpretation that we review de novo. ¶25 Flood argues that the trial court erred in doubling Benkoski’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2585 - 2017-09-19
State v. George Toland Ziedonis
). The application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law, and we decide it de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19809 - 2005-12-11
). The application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law, and we decide it de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19809 - 2005-12-11
[PDF]
Jim Smith v. Tracy Williams
6 interpretation, a question of law, which we review de novo. CSO Servicing Corp. v. City of Eau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3393 - 2017-09-19
6 interpretation, a question of law, which we review de novo. CSO Servicing Corp. v. City of Eau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3393 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Shirley D. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee
of law, which we review de novo. E.g., Stockbridge School Dist. v. Department of Pub. Instruction Sch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16908 - 2017-09-21
of law, which we review de novo. E.g., Stockbridge School Dist. v. Department of Pub. Instruction Sch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16908 - 2017-09-21
WI App 8 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP72-CR Complete Title of...
, we review the [trial] court’s application of constitutional principles to the findings of fact de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75460 - 2012-01-24
, we review the [trial] court’s application of constitutional principles to the findings of fact de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75460 - 2012-01-24