Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26891 - 26900 of 68271 for law.

Marino Construction Co., Inc. v. City of Milwaukee
statements made by their agent or employee is a question of law that we review de novo. See Snow v. Koeppl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7899 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Joseph M. Caminata
. This court recently summarized the applicable law governing sentence modification. The purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2835 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Damien L. Henning
968.25, STATS., in part, provides: When a law enforcement officer has stopped a person for temporary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12885 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of different statutes that require reasonable suspicion for a law enforcement search of people on community
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252639 - 2020-01-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Because an unconstitutional law is void
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134344 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Michael R. Behr v. Douglas County
: (1) the plaintiff must have been deprived of a right secured by the constitution or laws
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9225 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Scott A. Long
is a question of law subject to independent appellate review. See Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 116
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12840 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] David A. Clark v. Gary R. McCaughtry
only whether: (1) the agency stayed within its jurisdiction, (2) it acted according to law, (3) its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14507 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
to the defendant is higher, but not substantially higher, than that authorized by law, the incorrectly communicated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140873 - 2015-04-27

COURT OF APPEALS
test in violation of this state’s implied consent law. She alleges that there was no probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32804 - 2008-05-27