Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26891 - 26900 of 63559 for records.
Search results 26891 - 26900 of 63559 for records.
[PDF]
State v. David S. Leighton
that a defendant was denied this constitutional right on a record that strongly indicates … that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16075 - 2017-09-21
that a defendant was denied this constitutional right on a record that strongly indicates … that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16075 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
does not do so, we may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s discretionary decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109569 - 2014-03-26
does not do so, we may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s discretionary decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109569 - 2014-03-26
Frontsheet
not have a right to the award of damages because only those parties with an interest "of record" have
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82102 - 2012-05-03
not have a right to the award of damages because only those parties with an interest "of record" have
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82102 - 2012-05-03
State v. Anthony T. Hicks
. § 751.06.[1] Our examination of the record leads us to conclude that the real controversy was not fully
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16942 - 2005-03-31
. § 751.06.[1] Our examination of the record leads us to conclude that the real controversy was not fully
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16942 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 17
order.7 DISCUSSION 6 On the record, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630177 - 2023-05-23
order.7 DISCUSSION 6 On the record, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630177 - 2023-05-23
Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. v. Scott McCallum
). This is not such a case, however, and we therefore proceed to a de novo consideration of whether, on the record before us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5224 - 2005-03-31
). This is not such a case, however, and we therefore proceed to a de novo consideration of whether, on the record before us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5224 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reasoning, when the court does not do so, we may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109569 - 2017-09-21
reasoning, when the court does not do so, we may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109569 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Brown County v. Kathy C.
that “[t]he record fails to disclose that at the initial appearance [Kathy] was advised of her right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2692 - 2017-09-19
that “[t]he record fails to disclose that at the initial appearance [Kathy] was advised of her right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2692 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. In addition, the court stated it was speculative on this record whether those rulings did in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28659 - 2007-04-04
. In addition, the court stated it was speculative on this record whether those rulings did in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28659 - 2007-04-04
[PDF]
does not cite any record support for that assertion on appeal, and it acknowledges that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983919 - 2025-07-17
does not cite any record support for that assertion on appeal, and it acknowledges that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983919 - 2025-07-17