Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26891 - 26900 of 64160 for records.
Search results 26891 - 26900 of 64160 for records.
CA Blank Order
, Odom’s letter, and the record, we conclude that a challenge to the DNA surcharge would be arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104202 - 2013-11-07
, Odom’s letter, and the record, we conclude that a challenge to the DNA surcharge would be arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104202 - 2013-11-07
State v. Steven K. Pinney
will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] There is some confusion in the record as to whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9995 - 2005-03-31
will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] There is some confusion in the record as to whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9995 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John Lee Griffin
that cannot be waived by counsel, but only by the defendant personally, and no such waiver is of record here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10064 - 2017-09-19
that cannot be waived by counsel, but only by the defendant personally, and no such waiver is of record here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10064 - 2017-09-19
State v. Donald T. Fravert
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13983 - 2005-03-31
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13983 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard S. Dammon
and the files and records of the action conclusively show that the person is entitled to no relief. Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26282 - 2006-08-23
and the files and records of the action conclusively show that the person is entitled to no relief. Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26282 - 2006-08-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record, we conclude this appeal presents
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132853 - 2017-09-21
an independent review of the record, we conclude this appeal presents
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132853 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342959 - 2021-03-09
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342959 - 2021-03-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that counsel may be allowed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235784 - 2019-02-21
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that counsel may be allowed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235784 - 2019-02-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217671 - 2018-08-15
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217671 - 2018-08-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823447 - 2024-07-09
record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823447 - 2024-07-09