Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26891 - 26900 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 26891 - 26900 of 58285 for speedy trial.
State v. John Patrick Feeney
) the statute of limitations had run or the State should be precluded from filing charges, and the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20657 - 2005-12-19
) the statute of limitations had run or the State should be precluded from filing charges, and the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20657 - 2005-12-19
[PDF]
Beryl Bishop v. City of Burlington
. We affirm the trial court on the second and third issues. FACTS ¶2 The parking lot at issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2970 - 2017-09-19
. We affirm the trial court on the second and third issues. FACTS ¶2 The parking lot at issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2970 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Justus C. Burgweger
on the revocation. At that hearing before the trial court, Officer Jarstad was the only witness, and he testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14477 - 2017-09-21
on the revocation. At that hearing before the trial court, Officer Jarstad was the only witness, and he testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14477 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Christine M. Quackenbush
to be done after the expiration of the prescribed time.” ¶4 Quackenbush’s trial counsel filed on her behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4971 - 2017-09-19
to be done after the expiration of the prescribed time.” ¶4 Quackenbush’s trial counsel filed on her behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4971 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
a new trial on the ground that the jury was improperly instructed. The Bank cross-appeals the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143539 - 2015-06-24
a new trial on the ground that the jury was improperly instructed. The Bank cross-appeals the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143539 - 2015-06-24
State v. Michael D. Lee
trial counsel filed on her behalf a motion for an extension of the time to file a notice of intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4977 - 2005-03-31
trial counsel filed on her behalf a motion for an extension of the time to file a notice of intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4977 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the decision to either take the State’s plea offer or go to trial was a choice that belonged to his counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264669 - 2020-06-16
that the decision to either take the State’s plea offer or go to trial was a choice that belonged to his counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264669 - 2020-06-16
[PDF]
LeBakken Rent-To-Own v. David J. Warnell
of § 425.109(1), STATS.,4 required that the complaint be dismissed with costs. The trial court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14095 - 2014-09-15
of § 425.109(1), STATS.,4 required that the complaint be dismissed with costs. The trial court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14095 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
seeks a new trial for two reasons. She argues that the circuit court erred in the special verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181419 - 2017-09-21
seeks a new trial for two reasons. She argues that the circuit court erred in the special verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181419 - 2017-09-21
Margaret Henkel v. William West, M.D.
attorney fees. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by increasing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15271 - 2005-03-31
attorney fees. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by increasing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15271 - 2005-03-31