Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26891 - 26900 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 26891 - 26900 of 58492 for speedy trial.
WI App 15 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2808 Complete Title of...
. The simulation at issue was prepared during the course of trial by Meyers, the State’s expert, utilizing data
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76099 - 2012-02-28
. The simulation at issue was prepared during the course of trial by Meyers, the State’s expert, utilizing data
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76099 - 2012-02-28
2008 WI APP 89
We conclude that, although the plea colloquy was brief, since Hoppe assured the trial court that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32806 - 2008-06-24
We conclude that, although the plea colloquy was brief, since Hoppe assured the trial court that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32806 - 2008-06-24
[PDF]
Clifford Muchow v. Richard Goding
on behalf of the estate. The trial court entered an order on the stipulation "for Distribution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7760 - 2017-09-19
on behalf of the estate. The trial court entered an order on the stipulation "for Distribution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7760 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 89
. ¶2 We conclude that, although the plea colloquy was brief, since Hoppe assured the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32806 - 2014-09-15
. ¶2 We conclude that, although the plea colloquy was brief, since Hoppe assured the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32806 - 2014-09-15
Thomas G. Schanke v. Mitchell Street State Bank
judgments and the order of the trial court. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND ¶2 Schanke filed a declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4073 - 2005-03-31
judgments and the order of the trial court. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND ¶2 Schanke filed a declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4073 - 2005-03-31
State v. Timothy P. Zoellick
for disorderly conduct; (2) other acts evidence was improperly admitted; (3) the trial court failed to give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4325 - 2005-03-31
for disorderly conduct; (2) other acts evidence was improperly admitted; (3) the trial court failed to give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4325 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carlos D. Hope
) & 2, and 939.62.[1] Hope argues that the trial court erred in denying his suppression motion because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16174 - 2005-03-31
) & 2, and 939.62.[1] Hope argues that the trial court erred in denying his suppression motion because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16174 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard E. Davis
] Richard E. Davis appeals from a judgment, entered after a jury trial, finding him guilty of possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14557 - 2005-03-31
] Richard E. Davis appeals from a judgment, entered after a jury trial, finding him guilty of possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14557 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel Greene
a jury’s guilty verdict. ¶2 On appeal, Greene challenges the trial court’s ruling rejecting his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16089 - 2005-03-31
a jury’s guilty verdict. ¶2 On appeal, Greene challenges the trial court’s ruling rejecting his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16089 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Wendell L. Gaines
the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress a notebook the police seized as evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7868 - 2017-09-19
the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress a notebook the police seized as evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7868 - 2017-09-19