Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26901 - 26910 of 83303 for case search.
Search results 26901 - 26910 of 83303 for case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a no-merit report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel in each of these consolidated cases. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986619 - 2025-07-22
a no-merit report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel in each of these consolidated cases. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986619 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and with operating after revocation. The case was dismissed, and the State refiled the charges in February 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34916 - 2014-09-15
, and with operating after revocation. The case was dismissed, and the State refiled the charges in February 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34916 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that these cases are appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101801 - 2017-09-21
conclude at conference that these cases are appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101801 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
order. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155755 - 2017-09-21
order. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155755 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Lisa M. Berger
The central issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in denying the WIS. STAT. § 345.421 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2865 - 2017-09-19
The central issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in denying the WIS. STAT. § 345.421 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2865 - 2017-09-19
State v. Frank J. Sackatook, Jr.
that the prosecutor would have to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt and “if we had a jury deciding the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3275 - 2005-03-31
that the prosecutor would have to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt and “if we had a jury deciding the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3275 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Peterson, No. 2013AP893, unpublished slip op. (WI App Sept. 5, 2013). In each of those cases, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138428 - 2017-09-21
. Peterson, No. 2013AP893, unpublished slip op. (WI App Sept. 5, 2013). In each of those cases, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138428 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a decision in the criminal case. Therefore, rather than filing his “clarification” motion in the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32530 - 2005-03-31
a decision in the criminal case. Therefore, rather than filing his “clarification” motion in the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32530 - 2005-03-31
Date: January 11, 2010 To: Clerk of Court of Appeals From: District 3 Opinions for Release On Janu...
On January 12, 2010 Opinion Case Number Short Caption CountyName 2009AP000846 State v. Jennifer Z. Taylor
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45693 - 2010-01-10
On January 12, 2010 Opinion Case Number Short Caption CountyName 2009AP000846 State v. Jennifer Z. Taylor
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45693 - 2010-01-10
Date: May 21, 2007 To: Clerk of Court of Appeals From: District 3 Opinions for Release On May 22, ...
, 2007 Opinion Case Number Short Caption CountyName 2006AP001521 Hans Rechsteiner v. Hazelden Washburn
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29164 - 2007-05-20
, 2007 Opinion Case Number Short Caption CountyName 2006AP001521 Hans Rechsteiner v. Hazelden Washburn
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29164 - 2007-05-20