Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26911 - 26920 of 69450 for as he.
Search results 26911 - 26920 of 69450 for as he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his pre-sentence and postconviction motions for plea withdrawal. He also raises challenges to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92929 - 2014-09-15
his pre-sentence and postconviction motions for plea withdrawal. He also raises challenges to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92929 - 2014-09-15
Kevin B. v. Michael W.E.
the jury’s finding that he failed to demonstrate substantial progress toward meeting the conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13220 - 2005-03-31
the jury’s finding that he failed to demonstrate substantial progress toward meeting the conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13220 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the plea colloquy was inadequate and he was therefore entitled to at least an evidentiary hearing on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30166 - 2007-09-04
the plea colloquy was inadequate and he was therefore entitled to at least an evidentiary hearing on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30166 - 2007-09-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to develop a 158-acre parcel into a subdivision in the City of Mequon. Leszczynski claimed that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382401 - 2021-06-30
to develop a 158-acre parcel into a subdivision in the City of Mequon. Leszczynski claimed that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382401 - 2021-06-30
State v. Albert Steven Winfrey
, and Winfrey appeals. Winfrey argues that he did not receive effective assistance from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7907 - 2005-03-31
, and Winfrey appeals. Winfrey argues that he did not receive effective assistance from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7907 - 2005-03-31
Joeddie Smith v. Gary R. McCaughtry
Eppenger attend his hearing as witnesses. The request to have Eppenger testify was denied because he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18010 - 2005-05-04
Eppenger attend his hearing as witnesses. The request to have Eppenger testify was denied because he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18010 - 2005-05-04
[PDF]
Ralph Hiemstra v. Michael S. Damroth, M.D.
of consideration and because he claimed it violates Wisconsin’s rule against No. 2005AP559 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19584 - 2017-09-21
of consideration and because he claimed it violates Wisconsin’s rule against No. 2005AP559 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19584 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael Gisvold
male between the age of fifty and sixty years, if he was okay. The driver of the vehicle backed up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13451 - 2017-09-21
male between the age of fifty and sixty years, if he was okay. The driver of the vehicle backed up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13451 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and earnest desire to parent are not disputed. He appears to believe, however, either that any ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103113 - 2017-09-21
and earnest desire to parent are not disputed. He appears to believe, however, either that any ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103113 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
needed to find that he “caus[ed] bodily injury or harm to another[.]” Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 303.12(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142793 - 2015-06-01
needed to find that he “caus[ed] bodily injury or harm to another[.]” Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 303.12(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142793 - 2015-06-01