Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26911 - 26920 of 30070 for de.
Search results 26911 - 26920 of 30070 for de.
2006 WI 131
or regulation and the interpretation of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. Hillhaven Corp
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27514 - 2006-12-18
or regulation and the interpretation of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. Hillhaven Corp
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27514 - 2006-12-18
2007 WI APP 197
of the insurers. We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29665 - 2007-08-27
of the insurers. We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29665 - 2007-08-27
[PDF]
John L. Gorton v. Hostak
and contract interpretation. We review such questions de novo. See McEvoy v. Group Health Co-op of Eau
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17159 - 2017-09-21
and contract interpretation. We review such questions de novo. See McEvoy v. Group Health Co-op of Eau
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17159 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 205
review a trial court’s conclusions of law de novo. City of Muskego v. Godec, 167 Wis. 2d 536, 545
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29962 - 2014-09-15
review a trial court’s conclusions of law de novo. City of Muskego v. Godec, 167 Wis. 2d 536, 545
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29962 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to a particular set of facts is a question of law we review de novo. See Chappy v. LIRC, 136 Wis. 2d 172, 180
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139580 - 2015-04-13
to a particular set of facts is a question of law we review de novo. See Chappy v. LIRC, 136 Wis. 2d 172, 180
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139580 - 2015-04-13
[PDF]
WI APP 5
and placing him in squad car for thirty to forty-five minutes transformed stop into de facto arrest when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44987 - 2014-09-15
and placing him in squad car for thirty to forty-five minutes transformed stop into de facto arrest when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44987 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law which we review de novo.” State v. Head, 2002 WI 99, ¶44, 255 Wis. 2d 194, 648 N.W.2d 413
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86161 - 2012-08-15
is a question of law which we review de novo.” State v. Head, 2002 WI 99, ¶44, 255 Wis. 2d 194, 648 N.W.2d 413
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86161 - 2012-08-15
[PDF]
WI 41
the criteria for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81742 - 2014-09-15
the criteria for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81742 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 163
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that an appellate court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56883 - 2011-08-21
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that an appellate court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56883 - 2011-08-21
Shirley D. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee
is a question of law, which we review de novo. E.g., Stockbridge School Dist. v. Department of Pub. Instruction
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16908 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law, which we review de novo. E.g., Stockbridge School Dist. v. Department of Pub. Instruction
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16908 - 2005-03-31