Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26921 - 26930 of 84400 for case number.

State v. Paul Alan LeRose
and order. ¶2 LeRose was a private practice attorney who handled cases for the SPD in Kenosha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2420 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] George M. Reynolds v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
of the project. Going Garbage intervened as a respondent in both matters and the cases were consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9466 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable suspicion to stop Michals. Subsequently, the case was dismissed. This appeal follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160048 - 2017-09-21

George M. Reynolds v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
as a respondent in both matters and the cases were consolidated. The trial court issued a decision in May 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9466 - 2005-03-31

[PDF]
deposit. ¶6 The case was heard by a court commissioner who dismissed Crandall’s claims and ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=796379 - 2024-05-02

[PDF] De Ann Nichols v. Monte Nichols
to the particular facts in this case. The court’s rationale for deviating from the percentage standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7407 - 2017-09-20

2009 WI APP 60
2009 WI App 60 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP70-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36098 - 2011-02-07

[PDF] WI APP 159
2011 WI APP 159 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 2010AP2863
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72651 - 2014-09-15

Jerry L. Meana v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
. EICH, C.J. This is a worker's compensation case in which the employer, Minnesota Mining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9222 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Miguel Angel Santana-Lopez
2000 WI App 122 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15279 - 2017-09-21