Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26921 - 26930 of 29838 for des.
Search results 26921 - 26930 of 29838 for des.
[PDF]
Providence Catholic School v. Bristol School District No. 1
statutory interpretation. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo and without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14820 - 2017-09-21
statutory interpretation. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo and without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14820 - 2017-09-21
2010 WI APP 5
in handcuffs and placing him in squad car for thirty to forty-five minutes transformed stop into de facto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44987 - 2010-01-26
in handcuffs and placing him in squad car for thirty to forty-five minutes transformed stop into de facto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44987 - 2010-01-26
Frontsheet
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109456 - 2014-03-24
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109456 - 2014-03-24
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law which we review de novo.” State v. Head, 2002 WI 99, ¶44, 255 Wis. 2d 194, 648 N.W.2d 413
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86161 - 2012-08-15
is a question of law which we review de novo.” State v. Head, 2002 WI 99, ¶44, 255 Wis. 2d 194, 648 N.W.2d 413
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86161 - 2012-08-15
[PDF]
WI APP 255
to undisputed facts. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Tuescher, 226 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30753 - 2014-09-15
to undisputed facts. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Tuescher, 226 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30753 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Interpretation ¶19 We apply de novo review to a circuit court’s order granting a motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30345 - 2007-09-19
Interpretation ¶19 We apply de novo review to a circuit court’s order granting a motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30345 - 2007-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court has applied the correct legal standard is a question of law reviewed de novo.” Landwehr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=521710 - 2022-05-19
the circuit court has applied the correct legal standard is a question of law reviewed de novo.” Landwehr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=521710 - 2022-05-19
[PDF]
WI 63
judgment or order, both present questions of law that we review de novo. Wambolt, 299 Wis. 2d 723, ¶14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33079 - 2014-09-15
judgment or order, both present questions of law that we review de novo. Wambolt, 299 Wis. 2d 723, ¶14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33079 - 2014-09-15
Opinion-SC
review the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. Id. Finally, where misconduct
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55548 - 2010-10-13
review the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. Id. Finally, where misconduct
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55548 - 2010-10-13
Kurt Hallin v. John Hallin
the proper burden of proof is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Higginbotham, 110 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13224 - 2005-03-31
the proper burden of proof is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Higginbotham, 110 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13224 - 2005-03-31