Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26931 - 26940 of 29828 for des.
Search results 26931 - 26940 of 29828 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The arresting officer, De Pere Police Officer Alicia Bagley, was the sole witness called by the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=651721 - 2023-05-02
The arresting officer, De Pere Police Officer Alicia Bagley, was the sole witness called by the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=651721 - 2023-05-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’” Id., ¶14 (citation omitted). ¶14 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180502 - 2017-09-21
sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’” Id., ¶14 (citation omitted). ¶14 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180502 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id. (citations omitted). If the motion does not allege sufficient facts, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32111 - 2008-03-17
review de novo. Id. (citations omitted). If the motion does not allege sufficient facts, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32111 - 2008-03-17
State v. Willie Hogan
. Schmidt v. Wisconsin, 521 U.S. 1118. Our review is de novo. State v. Post, 197 Wis. 2d 279, 301, 541 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3283 - 2005-03-31
. Schmidt v. Wisconsin, 521 U.S. 1118. Our review is de novo. State v. Post, 197 Wis. 2d 279, 301, 541 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3283 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
review de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769. ¶15 Our goal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29552 - 2007-06-28
review de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769. ¶15 Our goal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29552 - 2007-06-28
Frontsheet
is a question of law that we review de novo, applying the same standards used by the circuit and set forth
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64259 - 2011-05-16
is a question of law that we review de novo, applying the same standards used by the circuit and set forth
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64259 - 2011-05-16
Carla S. v. Frank B.
has standing to participate in an action or proceeding is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16214 - 2005-03-31
has standing to participate in an action or proceeding is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16214 - 2005-03-31
HSBC Realty Credit Corporation v. City of Glendale
review de novo. State v. Waushara County Bd. of Adjustment, 2004 WI 56, ¶14, 271 Wis. 2d 547, 679 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25766 - 2006-08-29
review de novo. State v. Waushara County Bd. of Adjustment, 2004 WI 56, ¶14, 271 Wis. 2d 547, 679 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25766 - 2006-08-29
Wangard Partners, Inc. v. Gerald Graf
and application to a set of facts present questions of law for de novo review). When we interpret a statute, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25241 - 2006-06-27
and application to a set of facts present questions of law for de novo review). When we interpret a statute, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25241 - 2006-06-27
Guy Riccitelli, M.D. v. Fredrik Broekhuizen, M.D.
. The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. Castellani v. Bailey, 218 Wis. 2d 245
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17360 - 2005-03-31
. The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. Castellani v. Bailey, 218 Wis. 2d 245
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17360 - 2005-03-31