Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26931 - 26940 of 81650 for simple case.
Search results 26931 - 26940 of 81650 for simple case.
Certification
this standard fit in with the time limits for a motion to withdraw the plea? BACKGROUND In three separate cases
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133320 - 2015-01-20
this standard fit in with the time limits for a motion to withdraw the plea? BACKGROUND In three separate cases
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133320 - 2015-01-20
State v. William E. Marberry
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2883
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14594 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2883
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14594 - 2005-03-31
Scott Alan Ludtke v. Department of Corrections
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1745
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10982 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1745
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10982 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and (4) the combined effect of the asserted errors in his case prejudiced his defense. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122463 - 2014-09-25
, and (4) the combined effect of the asserted errors in his case prejudiced his defense. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122463 - 2014-09-25
Albert Carini v. The Medical Protective Company
. ANDERSON, J. In this medical malpractice case, the plaintiffs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12663 - 2005-03-31
. ANDERSON, J. In this medical malpractice case, the plaintiffs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12663 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing Jefferson, and remand the case to the trial court for resentencing. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83975 - 2014-09-15
sentencing Jefferson, and remand the case to the trial court for resentencing. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83975 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of confinement following revocation of his extended supervision in an earlier case. Pursuant to WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541243 - 2022-07-12
of confinement following revocation of his extended supervision in an earlier case. Pursuant to WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541243 - 2022-07-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the minimum period of confinement under WIS. STAT. § 346.65(2)(cm) was available in his case. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422426 - 2021-09-08
the minimum period of confinement under WIS. STAT. § 346.65(2)(cm) was available in his case. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422426 - 2021-09-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the precise facts presented in a given case. See id., ¶21. Rather, great weight deference is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170273 - 2017-09-21
the precise facts presented in a given case. See id., ¶21. Rather, great weight deference is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170273 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the agency’s fact-finding function even though, if viewing the case ab initio, it would come to another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29658 - 2014-09-15
of the agency’s fact-finding function even though, if viewing the case ab initio, it would come to another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29658 - 2014-09-15