Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26941 - 26950 of 30172 for de.

State v. Bart C. Gruetzmacher
review de novo. State v. Davison, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d 145, 666 N.W.2d 1. See also State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16689 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of review that this court should apply, Sullivan argues for de novo review, because the Commission’s alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107543 - 2014-01-29

Frontsheet
is a question of law that we review de novo, applying the same standards used by the circuit and set forth
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64259 - 2011-05-16

La Crosse Queen, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
is engaged in interstate commerce is a question of law, and we review questions of law de novo." Town
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17062 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
to a particular set of facts is a question of law we review de novo. See Chappy v. LIRC, 136 Wis. 2d 172, 180
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139580 - 2015-04-13

[PDF] WI 112
the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29853 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
summary judgment ruling is de novo. L.L.N., 209 Wis. 2d at 682. I am not concluding that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603788 - 2022-12-22

State v. Anthony Glenn
-included offense instruction presents a question of law which we review de novo. Wilson, 149 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16882 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John L. Gorton v. Hostak
and contract interpretation. We review such questions de novo. See McEvoy v. Group Health Co-op of Eau
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17159 - 2017-09-21

Hal Hempel v. City of Baraboo
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Mayfair Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Baldarotta
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6194 - 2005-03-31