Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26941 - 26950 of 76965 for judgment for u s.
Search results 26941 - 26950 of 76965 for judgment for u s.
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: william s. pocan, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97649 - 2013-06-03
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: william s. pocan, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97649 - 2013-06-03
[PDF]
State v. Randy J. Netzer
. In our order, we noted that Netzer’s “latest motion cannot be a direct appeal of the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6108 - 2017-09-19
. In our order, we noted that Netzer’s “latest motion cannot be a direct appeal of the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6108 - 2017-09-19
State v. Cheryl A. Koenig
followed by twenty-four months of extended supervision. ¶4 The judgment lists the conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5183 - 2005-03-31
followed by twenty-four months of extended supervision. ¶4 The judgment lists the conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5183 - 2005-03-31
State v. Randy J. Netzer
of the judgment of conviction but rather it is a postconviction motion under Wis. Stat. § 974.06.” ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6108 - 2005-03-31
of the judgment of conviction but rather it is a postconviction motion under Wis. Stat. § 974.06.” ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6108 - 2005-03-31
Catalytic Combustion Corporation v. Vapor Extraction Technology, Inc.
Extraction Technology, Inc.’s motion to dismiss Catalytic’s complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2270 - 2005-03-31
Extraction Technology, Inc.’s motion to dismiss Catalytic’s complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2270 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35412 - 2009-02-03
that was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35412 - 2009-02-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: WILLIAM S. POCAN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97649 - 2014-09-15
from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: WILLIAM S. POCAN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97649 - 2014-09-15
99-02 In the Matter of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR 70.40 -- Venue in Prisoner Cases
inmate prisoner, as defined in s. 801.02 (7) (a) 2., stats., seeking to commence, prosecute or defend
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1001 - 2005-03-31
inmate prisoner, as defined in s. 801.02 (7) (a) 2., stats., seeking to commence, prosecute or defend
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1001 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
grant J.D.C.’s motion and summarily reverse the orders pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21.2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821887 - 2024-07-03
grant J.D.C.’s motion and summarily reverse the orders pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21.2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821887 - 2024-07-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
grant J.D.C.’s motion and summarily reverse the orders pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821887 - 2024-07-03
grant J.D.C.’s motion and summarily reverse the orders pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821887 - 2024-07-03