Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26941 - 26950 of 44408 for name change.

[PDF] Fran Ingebritson v. The Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Madison
. In 1985, the same owner applied for an amendment to the zoning ordinance to change the zoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9324 - 2017-09-19

Frontsheet
changes to "reflect current interpretations and practices." Id. ¶41 While there are no cases prior
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103928 - 2014-01-06

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
-04).[1] The case was originally scheduled for a jury trial, then changed to a projected guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27039 - 2006-11-06

[PDF] Published Order
adopted these laws largely without change and appointed a special legislative committee to help
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=653159 - 2023-05-16

Gary L. Crawley v. Edward L. Mazola
to its attention would change its mind on the ruling, and it viewed Mazola’s disagreement with the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12452 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
division of WGS, stated in his deposition that when he changed companies, his job basically did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28612 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 20
in the statutes because each term has a textual function and neither term could be omitted without changing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632770 - 2023-05-23

Richard W. Ziervogel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment
variances do not involve great changes in the character of the neighborhoods as do use variances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5370 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 70
12 ¶24 The changes that the legislature did and did not make show that WIS. STAT. § 146.83(3f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=433993 - 2021-11-16

[PDF] Gary L. Crawley v. Edward L. Mazola
and the close of all evidence; (2) moved to change the answer “yes” to “no” on punitive damages and change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12452 - 2017-09-21