Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26951 - 26960 of 30172 for de.
Search results 26951 - 26960 of 30172 for de.
[PDF]
WI APP 255
to undisputed facts. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Tuescher, 226 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30753 - 2014-09-15
to undisputed facts. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Tuescher, 226 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30753 - 2014-09-15
State v. Zan Morgan
is “in custody” for Miranda purposes is a question of law, which we review de novo based on the facts as found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4281 - 2005-03-31
is “in custody” for Miranda purposes is a question of law, which we review de novo based on the facts as found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4281 - 2005-03-31
Nathaniel Allen Lindell v. Jon E. Litscher
that we interpret the above-cited statutes. A question of law is thus presented, which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6887 - 2005-03-31
that we interpret the above-cited statutes. A question of law is thus presented, which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6887 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s assistance was ineffective is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶16 Counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064707 - 2026-01-21
counsel’s assistance was ineffective is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶16 Counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064707 - 2026-01-21
State v. Edward L. Riley
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. 1. Was Riley’s detention valid under the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13903 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. 1. Was Riley’s detention valid under the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13903 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
statutory interpretation, de novo. State v. Volk, 2002 WI App 274, ¶34, 258 Wis. 2d 584, 654 N.W.2d 24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40865 - 2014-09-15
statutory interpretation, de novo. State v. Volk, 2002 WI App 274, ¶34, 258 Wis. 2d 584, 654 N.W.2d 24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40865 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142363 - 2015-05-19
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142363 - 2015-05-19
John T. Morris v. Juneau County
review de novo. See Colby v. Columbia County 202 Wis. 2d 342, 349, 550 N.W.2d 124 (1996) (citing Pufahl
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17149 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See Colby v. Columbia County 202 Wis. 2d 342, 349, 550 N.W.2d 124 (1996) (citing Pufahl
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17149 - 2005-03-31
Madison Newspapers, Inc. v. Pinkerton's Inc.
of the contract. MNI's appeal from those rulings raises only questions of law, which we consider de novo, owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8756 - 2005-03-31
of the contract. MNI's appeal from those rulings raises only questions of law, which we consider de novo, owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8756 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 43
of a municipal ordinance is a question of law subject to de novo review. Board of Regents of the Univ. of Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31863 - 2014-09-15
of a municipal ordinance is a question of law subject to de novo review. Board of Regents of the Univ. of Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31863 - 2014-09-15