Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26951 - 26960 of 29827 for des.
Search results 26951 - 26960 of 29827 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2017AP1889-CR 13 provocation. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235521 - 2019-02-20
. No. 2017AP1889-CR 13 provocation. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235521 - 2019-02-20
[PDF]
State v. James L. Creamer
was harmless—that it did not affect the verdict, or had such slight effect as to be de minimis—we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11430 - 2017-09-19
was harmless—that it did not affect the verdict, or had such slight effect as to be de minimis—we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11430 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=387021 - 2021-07-13
to the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=387021 - 2021-07-13
COURT OF APPEALS
converted James’ motion to one for summary judgment. ¶25 We review de novo the grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56357 - 2010-11-03
converted James’ motion to one for summary judgment. ¶25 We review de novo the grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56357 - 2010-11-03
David A.C. v. Veronica L.D.
of law, which we review de novo. Northwest Wholesale Lumber, Inc. v. Anderson, 191 Wis. 2d 278, 283, 528
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15895 - 2005-03-31
of law, which we review de novo. Northwest Wholesale Lumber, Inc. v. Anderson, 191 Wis. 2d 278, 283, 528
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15895 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
law. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Ermers, 2011 WI App 113
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144246 - 2015-07-08
law. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Ermers, 2011 WI App 113
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144246 - 2015-07-08
[PDF]
Sallie T. v. Milwaukee County Department of Health and Human Services
that “the foster parent has a right to de novo trial court review of the agency’s decision to change placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11643 - 2017-09-19
that “the foster parent has a right to de novo trial court review of the agency’s decision to change placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11643 - 2017-09-19
2006 WI 131
or regulation and the interpretation of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. Hillhaven Corp
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27514 - 2006-12-18
or regulation and the interpretation of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. Hillhaven Corp
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27514 - 2006-12-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, subject to our de novo review.” State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763335 - 2024-02-13
is a question of law, subject to our de novo review.” State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763335 - 2024-02-13
State v. Antonio A. Scott
of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Moats, 156 Wis.2d 74, 101, 457 N.W.2d 299, 311
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14300 - 2005-03-31
of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Moats, 156 Wis.2d 74, 101, 457 N.W.2d 299, 311
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14300 - 2005-03-31