Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26951 - 26960 of 46092 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 26951 - 26960 of 46092 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
State v. Robert R. Shaffer
. The State presented sufficient evidence to support the convictions. The test is whether the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11137 - 2017-09-19
. The State presented sufficient evidence to support the convictions. The test is whether the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11137 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Eugene Cherry v. Donald Gudmanson
, 585 N.W.2d 640 (Ct. App. 1998). We review the evidence using the substantial evidence test, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15925 - 2017-09-21
, 585 N.W.2d 640 (Ct. App. 1998). We review the evidence using the substantial evidence test, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15925 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Terri L. Boortz
plea to address the “subjective confusion” test which the supreme court discussed but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12690 - 2017-09-21
plea to address the “subjective confusion” test which the supreme court discussed but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12690 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the ineffective assistance test if the defendant fails to make a sufficient showing on one of them. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612397 - 2023-01-25
of the ineffective assistance test if the defendant fails to make a sufficient showing on one of them. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612397 - 2023-01-25
State v. Kevin B. Johnson
, 221 Wis.2d 203, 211, 584 N.W.2d 553, 557 (Ct. App. 1998). The test is whether a reasonable person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15036 - 2005-03-31
, 221 Wis.2d 203, 211, 584 N.W.2d 553, 557 (Ct. App. 1998). The test is whether a reasonable person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15036 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gerald Heckathorn
. The officer knew that Heckathorn had tested positive for marijuana seven times during his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17824 - 2005-05-02
. The officer knew that Heckathorn had tested positive for marijuana seven times during his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17824 - 2005-05-02
State v. Robert Taylor
that denied the motion after a hearing on remand. ¶3 There is a five-part test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26215 - 2006-08-15
that denied the motion after a hearing on remand. ¶3 There is a five-part test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26215 - 2006-08-15
R & R Logging v. Flannery Trucking, Inc.
that presented by this case is not the test we apply to ascertain coverage. We must determine only whether
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11906 - 2005-03-31
that presented by this case is not the test we apply to ascertain coverage. We must determine only whether
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11906 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frank Cowan
in a § 974.06, Stats., motion. The test for determining if a sentence is cruel and unusual is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9328 - 2005-03-31
in a § 974.06, Stats., motion. The test for determining if a sentence is cruel and unusual is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9328 - 2005-03-31
Patricia Marie Wathen v. Robert W. Moore
of the substantial-change-in-circumstances test, under Wis. Stat. § 767.25(3), which provides that “[v]iolation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5594 - 2005-03-31
of the substantial-change-in-circumstances test, under Wis. Stat. § 767.25(3), which provides that “[v]iolation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5594 - 2005-03-31