Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26951 - 26960 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 26951 - 26960 of 58506 for speedy trial.
State v. Michael D. Lee
trial counsel filed on her behalf a motion for an extension of the time to file a notice of intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4977 - 2005-03-31
trial counsel filed on her behalf a motion for an extension of the time to file a notice of intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4977 - 2005-03-31
Beryl Bishop v. City of Burlington
discussed below. We affirm the trial court on the second and third issues. FACTS ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2970 - 2005-03-31
discussed below. We affirm the trial court on the second and third issues. FACTS ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2970 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
LeBakken Rent-To-Own v. David J. Warnell
of § 425.109(1), STATS.,4 required that the complaint be dismissed with costs. The trial court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14095 - 2014-09-15
of § 425.109(1), STATS.,4 required that the complaint be dismissed with costs. The trial court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14095 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Lee
to be done after the expiration of the prescribed time.” ¶4 Quackenbush’s trial counsel filed on her behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4977 - 2017-09-19
to be done after the expiration of the prescribed time.” ¶4 Quackenbush’s trial counsel filed on her behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4977 - 2017-09-19
State v. Odell Fisher
. Further, we conclude that the trial court correctly exercised its sentencing discretion when it considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10994 - 2005-03-31
. Further, we conclude that the trial court correctly exercised its sentencing discretion when it considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10994 - 2005-03-31
Craig I. Halverson v. June E. Halverson
from Craig Halverson. She contends the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2801 - 2005-03-31
from Craig Halverson. She contends the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2801 - 2005-03-31
General Accident Insurance Company of America v. Schoendorf & Sorgi
. This is an appeal and cross-appeal from non-final orders entered by the trial court in a legal/accounting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7997 - 2005-03-31
. This is an appeal and cross-appeal from non-final orders entered by the trial court in a legal/accounting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7997 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Odell Fisher
privacy rights; therefore, we affirm the judgments of conviction. Further, we conclude that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10994 - 2017-09-19
privacy rights; therefore, we affirm the judgments of conviction. Further, we conclude that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10994 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 92
-CR 2 ¶1 FINE, J. Garrett L. Huff appeals the judgment convicting him after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36384 - 2014-09-15
-CR 2 ¶1 FINE, J. Garrett L. Huff appeals the judgment convicting him after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36384 - 2014-09-15
State v. Marilyn R. Whiterabbit
, and alternatively, that we should order a new trial on all counts in the interest of justice. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15831 - 2005-03-31
, and alternatively, that we should order a new trial on all counts in the interest of justice. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15831 - 2005-03-31