Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26961 - 26970 of 58546 for speedy trial.
Search results 26961 - 26970 of 58546 for speedy trial.
State v. Christine M. Quackenbush
trial counsel filed on her behalf a motion for an extension of the time to file a notice of intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4971 - 2005-03-31
trial counsel filed on her behalf a motion for an extension of the time to file a notice of intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4971 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael D. Lee
trial counsel filed on her behalf a motion for an extension of the time to file a notice of intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4977 - 2005-03-31
trial counsel filed on her behalf a motion for an extension of the time to file a notice of intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4977 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Lee
to be done after the expiration of the prescribed time.” ¶4 Quackenbush’s trial counsel filed on her behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4977 - 2017-09-19
to be done after the expiration of the prescribed time.” ¶4 Quackenbush’s trial counsel filed on her behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4977 - 2017-09-19
State v. Marilyn R. Whiterabbit
, and alternatively, that we should order a new trial on all counts in the interest of justice. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15831 - 2005-03-31
, and alternatively, that we should order a new trial on all counts in the interest of justice. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15831 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the decision to either take the State’s plea offer or go to trial was a choice that belonged to his counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264669 - 2020-06-16
that the decision to either take the State’s plea offer or go to trial was a choice that belonged to his counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264669 - 2020-06-16
[PDF]
State v. Justus C. Burgweger
on the revocation. At that hearing before the trial court, Officer Jarstad was the only witness, and he testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14477 - 2017-09-21
on the revocation. At that hearing before the trial court, Officer Jarstad was the only witness, and he testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14477 - 2017-09-21
State v. Justus C. Burgweger
on the revocation. At that hearing before the trial court, Officer Jarstad was the only witness, and he testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14477 - 2005-03-31
on the revocation. At that hearing before the trial court, Officer Jarstad was the only witness, and he testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14477 - 2005-03-31
State v. John Patrick Feeney
) the statute of limitations had run or the State should be precluded from filing charges, and the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20657 - 2005-12-19
) the statute of limitations had run or the State should be precluded from filing charges, and the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20657 - 2005-12-19
WI App 15 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2449-CR Complete Title...
a reasonable doubt; and (3) Henning is entitled to a new trial on the ground that the real controversy has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92339 - 2013-02-25
a reasonable doubt; and (3) Henning is entitled to a new trial on the ground that the real controversy has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92339 - 2013-02-25
State v. Mary C. Z.
trial counsel ineffectively pursued these arguments. We agree that there is insufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6882 - 2005-03-31
trial counsel ineffectively pursued these arguments. We agree that there is insufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6882 - 2005-03-31