Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26961 - 26970 of 58303 for speedy trial.
Search results 26961 - 26970 of 58303 for speedy trial.
State v. Andrew N. Bauerfield
and an order denying postconviction relief. Bauerfield contends that his trial attorney was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25758 - 2006-07-04
and an order denying postconviction relief. Bauerfield contends that his trial attorney was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25758 - 2006-07-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response asserting his innocence and suggesting that two trial witnesses should be charged with perjury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786865 - 2024-04-09
a response asserting his innocence and suggesting that two trial witnesses should be charged with perjury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786865 - 2024-04-09
[PDF]
Stephen E. Lee v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
of the trial court's oral decision, the parties do not dispute that the trial court dismissed Lee's action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8807 - 2017-09-19
of the trial court's oral decision, the parties do not dispute that the trial court dismissed Lee's action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8807 - 2017-09-19
State v. Genevieve M. Pauser
, that the jury instructions were confusing and erroneous such that she should receive a new trial in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6520 - 2005-03-31
, that the jury instructions were confusing and erroneous such that she should receive a new trial in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6520 - 2005-03-31
Paul Piikkila v. Tim Loritz
to both Piikkila and Loritz. The trial court concluded that Piikkila was entitled to the money. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6820 - 2005-03-31
to both Piikkila and Loritz. The trial court concluded that Piikkila was entitled to the money. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6820 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott C. Harty
as: “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15588 - 2005-03-31
as: “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15588 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court erred when instructing the jury, and that the trial court made a prejudicial remark during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68316 - 2014-09-15
court erred when instructing the jury, and that the trial court made a prejudicial remark during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68316 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Andrew N. Bauerfield
a judgment of conviction and an order denying postconviction relief. Bauerfield contends that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25758 - 2017-09-21
a judgment of conviction and an order denying postconviction relief. Bauerfield contends that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25758 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to ineffective assistance of his trial counsel. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214777 - 2018-06-26
to ineffective assistance of his trial counsel. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214777 - 2018-06-26
[PDF]
Dorothy Wentland v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
, claiming that the issues of liability and damages remained unresolved. Prior to trial, American Family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8008 - 2017-09-19
, claiming that the issues of liability and damages remained unresolved. Prior to trial, American Family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8008 - 2017-09-19