Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26961 - 26970 of 38484 for t's.
Search results 26961 - 26970 of 38484 for t's.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 13, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=439265 - 2021-10-13
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 13, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=439265 - 2021-10-13
COURT OF APPEALS
failed, “[t]rial counsel is not ineffective simply because an otherwise reasonable trial strategy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94948 - 2013-04-08
failed, “[t]rial counsel is not ineffective simply because an otherwise reasonable trial strategy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94948 - 2013-04-08
James Munroe v. Patrick D. Braatz
for the proposition that "[t]he denial of public access generally is contrary to the public interest, and only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9679 - 2005-03-31
for the proposition that "[t]he denial of public access generally is contrary to the public interest, and only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9679 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kelly G. O'Shea
. "[T]rial courts have wide discretion in deciding what instructions will be given so long as they fully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11707 - 2005-03-31
. "[T]rial courts have wide discretion in deciding what instructions will be given so long as they fully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11707 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
probability” means “much more likely than not”). Specifically, Sharon contends that “[t]he only evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033397 - 2025-11-04
probability” means “much more likely than not”). Specifically, Sharon contends that “[t]he only evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033397 - 2025-11-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” has been defined as “[t]he work of keeping something in proper condition; upkeep.” Hocking v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050930 - 2025-12-17
” has been defined as “[t]he work of keeping something in proper condition; upkeep.” Hocking v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050930 - 2025-12-17
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance.” Id. at 690. To demonstrate prejudice, “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87379 - 2012-09-24
assistance.” Id. at 690. To demonstrate prejudice, “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87379 - 2012-09-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, “[T]his is argument and [the jury will] get an instruction.” That ruling, which was favorable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958252 - 2025-05-20
, “[T]his is argument and [the jury will] get an instruction.” That ruling, which was favorable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958252 - 2025-05-20
COURT OF APPEALS
of the estate; “[i]t implies a willingness to do something wrong or unfair.” Id. at 161. Here, Marcia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101602 - 2013-09-04
of the estate; “[i]t implies a willingness to do something wrong or unfair.” Id. at 161. Here, Marcia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101602 - 2013-09-04
COURT OF APPEALS
no value. Without citation to the record, Ann contends “[t]he record supports that the [sic] Roger’s firm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97423 - 2013-05-30
no value. Without citation to the record, Ann contends “[t]he record supports that the [sic] Roger’s firm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97423 - 2013-05-30