Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26971 - 26980 of 69450 for as he.
Search results 26971 - 26980 of 69450 for as he.
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
concluded that McClellan did not meet the burden of proof required under § 767.325(1), Stats., because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8227 - 2005-03-31
concluded that McClellan did not meet the burden of proof required under § 767.325(1), Stats., because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8227 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
required under § 767.325(1), STATS., because he failed to show that the modification was necessary because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8227 - 2017-09-19
required under § 767.325(1), STATS., because he failed to show that the modification was necessary because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8227 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Donyil Anderson
an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief. He claims his sentence should be commuted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10935 - 2017-09-20
an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief. He claims his sentence should be commuted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10935 - 2017-09-20
State v. Maurice W. Carpenter
of battery, armed robbery and operating a motor vehicle without the owner’s consent. He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10727 - 2005-03-31
of battery, armed robbery and operating a motor vehicle without the owner’s consent. He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10727 - 2005-03-31
Charlene A. Seichter v. Joseph L. McDonald
of the accident, he was a resident of his parents’ household. That was the sole issue at trial, and the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14643 - 2005-03-31
of the accident, he was a resident of his parents’ household. That was the sole issue at trial, and the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14643 - 2005-03-31
State v. David E. Williams
. Stat. § 974.06 (1999-2000) motion.[1] Williams claims that: (1) he was denied the effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4450 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. § 974.06 (1999-2000) motion.[1] Williams claims that: (1) he was denied the effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4450 - 2005-03-31
City of Wautoma v. Richard A. Wehe
arrest was not based on probable cause and that the sobriety tests he performed are not probative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15050 - 2005-03-31
arrest was not based on probable cause and that the sobriety tests he performed are not probative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15050 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gerald R. Fogle
of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19889 - 2017-09-21
of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19889 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the revaluation process he evaluated all of the Village’s seventy-eight waterfront properties, eleven of which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141859 - 2017-09-21
of the revaluation process he evaluated all of the Village’s seventy-eight waterfront properties, eleven of which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141859 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ernest J.P., Jr.
and outpatient treatment. He argues that his commitment hearing was defective because the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7128 - 2017-09-20
and outpatient treatment. He argues that his commitment hearing was defective because the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7128 - 2017-09-20