Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26971 - 26980 of 30177 for de.
Search results 26971 - 26980 of 30177 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Zan Morgan
, which we review de novo based on the facts as found by the trial court. State v. Mosher, 221 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4281 - 2017-09-19
, which we review de novo based on the facts as found by the trial court. State v. Mosher, 221 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4281 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence H.
review de novo. See id. When we address a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11587 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. See id. When we address a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11587 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
law. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Ermers, 2011 WI App 113
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144246 - 2017-09-21
law. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Ermers, 2011 WI App 113
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144246 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statutory interpretation, our review is de novo.” DOR v. Microsoft Corp., 2019 WI App 62, ¶13, 389 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682403 - 2023-07-25
statutory interpretation, our review is de novo.” DOR v. Microsoft Corp., 2019 WI App 62, ¶13, 389 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682403 - 2023-07-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
recognition protocol conducted by Knutson and officer Bagley, a drug recognition expert from the De Pere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210358 - 2018-03-27
recognition protocol conducted by Knutson and officer Bagley, a drug recognition expert from the De Pere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210358 - 2018-03-27
[PDF]
Frontsheet
of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109456 - 2017-09-21
of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109456 - 2017-09-21
State v. Anthony Harris
of law that we review de novo. State v. Guzy, 139 Wis. 2d 663, 671, 407 N.W.2d 548, cert. denied, 484
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17025 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo. State v. Guzy, 139 Wis. 2d 663, 671, 407 N.W.2d 548, cert. denied, 484
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17025 - 2005-03-31
Tracie M. v. Andrew J.W.
] While Andrew couches his argument as one of law, which we should decide de novo, we see his challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11823 - 2005-03-31
] While Andrew couches his argument as one of law, which we should decide de novo, we see his challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11823 - 2005-03-31
Kimberly Schreiber v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin
, however, are entitled to no deference, and are reviewed by this court under a de novo standard. Ball v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11886 - 2005-03-31
, however, are entitled to no deference, and are reviewed by this court under a de novo standard. Ball v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11886 - 2005-03-31
WI App 100 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2013AP1916-CR 2014AP166-CR ...
of review: we uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122771 - 2014-10-28
of review: we uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122771 - 2014-10-28