Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26971 - 26980 of 30072 for de.

State v. Isaac H. Williams
. Schmidt v. Wisconsin, 521 U.S. 1118. Our review is de novo. State v. Post, 197 Wis. 2d 279, 301, 541 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3190 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. ABKA Ltd. P’ship v. DNR, 2002 WI 106, ¶29, 255 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118597 - 2014-07-30

[PDF] WI APP 34
a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. The purpose of statutory interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93174 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Lucian Agnello
review de novo. Id. No. 96-3406-CR 15 Agnello claims that the trial judge’s impartiality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11759 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶21. This court reviews de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30575 - 2007-10-16

State v. Luis A. Alvarenga
that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Davison, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d 145, 666 N.W.2d 1. “Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6588 - 2005-03-31

FH Healthcare Development, Inc. v. City of Wauwatosa
is a question of law” that we review de novo. St. Elizabeth Hosp., Inc. v. City of Appleton, 141 Wis. 2d 787
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7029 - 2005-03-31

Hope J. Ellsworth v. Mark A. Schelbrock
, including Medical Assistance. Statutory interpretation is also a question of law, which we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17358 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
to be clearly erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113971 - 2017-09-21

Thomas R. Ward v. Town of Nashville
. Thompson, 155 Wis. 2d 442, 444, 455 N.W.2d 268 (Ct. App. 1990) (implicitly applying de novo review to issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2481 - 2005-03-31