Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26971 - 26980 of 41998 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 26971 - 26980 of 41998 for jury duty/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a child under the age of twelve for assaults that occurred when the victim was eight years old. A jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252215 - 2020-01-14
of a child under the age of twelve for assaults that occurred when the victim was eight years old. A jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252215 - 2020-01-14
Lindsay Mosher v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
and his liability insurance carrier for medical malpractice, after a jury returned a verdict finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15114 - 2005-03-31
and his liability insurance carrier for medical malpractice, after a jury returned a verdict finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15114 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reject these arguments. Accordingly, we affirm. ΒΆ2 Laster was convicted after a jury trial of one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234444 - 2019-02-12
reject these arguments. Accordingly, we affirm. ΒΆ2 Laster was convicted after a jury trial of one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234444 - 2019-02-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2012AP2826 2 BACKGROUND In 2003, a jury found Hard guilty of second-degree sexual assault of a child
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103068 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2012AP2826 2 BACKGROUND In 2003, a jury found Hard guilty of second-degree sexual assault of a child
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103068 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jerome W.
entered a contest posture to the original petition and requested a jury trial. A trial date was set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20227 - 2005-12-21
entered a contest posture to the original petition and requested a jury trial. A trial date was set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20227 - 2005-12-21
State v. Jackie C.
] On September 4, 2001, at the time set for jury trial on the petition, Jackie C. waived his right to a fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5341 - 2005-03-31
] On September 4, 2001, at the time set for jury trial on the petition, Jackie C. waived his right to a fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5341 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jackie C.
] On September 4, 2001, at the time set for jury trial on the petition, Jackie C. waived his right to a fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5340 - 2005-03-31
] On September 4, 2001, at the time set for jury trial on the petition, Jackie C. waived his right to a fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5340 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jackie C.
] On September 4, 2001, at the time set for jury trial on the petition, Jackie C. waived his right to a fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5339 - 2005-03-31
] On September 4, 2001, at the time set for jury trial on the petition, Jackie C. waived his right to a fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5339 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jackie C.
] On September 4, 2001, at the time set for jury trial on the petition, Jackie C. waived his right to a fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5338 - 2005-03-31
] On September 4, 2001, at the time set for jury trial on the petition, Jackie C. waived his right to a fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5338 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
collaterally estopped from reaching a different result than the jury on the battery charge; and (8) no one ever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87531 - 2012-09-26
collaterally estopped from reaching a different result than the jury on the battery charge; and (8) no one ever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87531 - 2012-09-26