Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26981 - 26990 of 83431 for simple case search.
Search results 26981 - 26990 of 83431 for simple case search.
[PDF]
WI APP 240
2007 WI APP 240 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP2753-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30631 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 240 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP2753-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30631 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the case was dismissed without prejudice, and then re-filed with identical charges in the case number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644642 - 2023-04-18
, the case was dismissed without prejudice, and then re-filed with identical charges in the case number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644642 - 2023-04-18
State v. Rushun L. J.
is sufficient to retain competency, there was no affirmative evidence of consent in this case; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24857 - 2006-04-17
is sufficient to retain competency, there was no affirmative evidence of consent in this case; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24857 - 2006-04-17
[PDF]
State v. Johnny K. Pinder
the trial court had proper jurisdiction in this case, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On September 9, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25053 - 2017-09-21
the trial court had proper jurisdiction in this case, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On September 9, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25053 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 232
2006 WI APP 232 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP2349
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26899 - 2014-09-15
2006 WI APP 232 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP2349
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26899 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
fence. ¶5 The State asserted in its closing argument that the primary evidence in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56014 - 2010-10-27
fence. ¶5 The State asserted in its closing argument that the primary evidence in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56014 - 2010-10-27
Certification
for this?” did he unambiguously invoke his right to counsel? No similar case has been published in Wisconsin
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89305 - 2012-11-13
for this?” did he unambiguously invoke his right to counsel? No similar case has been published in Wisconsin
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89305 - 2012-11-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
] time period …. Sec. 48.415(1)(c). ¶7 Kristen Kaskin, a case worker for the County, averred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186155 - 2017-09-21
] time period …. Sec. 48.415(1)(c). ¶7 Kristen Kaskin, a case worker for the County, averred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186155 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Winnebago County Health and Human Services v. Bridget D.
notification of the judge’s assignment to the case is received less than twenty-four hours prior to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6309 - 2017-09-19
notification of the judge’s assignment to the case is received less than twenty-four hours prior to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6309 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. The case was tried to a jury. The trial testimony relevant to the issues on appeal centered on two main
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106014 - 2013-12-26
. The case was tried to a jury. The trial testimony relevant to the issues on appeal centered on two main
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106014 - 2013-12-26