Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26991 - 27000 of 59254 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 26991 - 27000 of 59254 for SMALL CLAIMS.
COURT OF APPEALS
to object to a restitution claim. We affirm. ¶2 This case arises out of a drunken brawl in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93313 - 2013-02-25
to object to a restitution claim. We affirm. ¶2 This case arises out of a drunken brawl in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93313 - 2013-02-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentence and claiming that his trial counsel was ineffective at the sentencing hearing. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722201 - 2023-10-31
sentence and claiming that his trial counsel was ineffective at the sentencing hearing. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722201 - 2023-10-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
moved for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. Marlow asserted that Campbell now claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207881 - 2018-02-01
moved for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. Marlow asserted that Campbell now claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207881 - 2018-02-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentence and claiming that his trial counsel was ineffective at the sentencing hearing. Upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722201 - 2023-10-31
sentence and claiming that his trial counsel was ineffective at the sentencing hearing. Upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722201 - 2023-10-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that some of its back charges were delay charges, and gave up its claim for about $125,000 of the total back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51919 - 2010-07-13
that some of its back charges were delay charges, and gave up its claim for about $125,000 of the total back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51919 - 2010-07-13
State v. Jessie L. Stokes
an order denying his motion for sentence modification. He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26400 - 2006-09-06
an order denying his motion for sentence modification. He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26400 - 2006-09-06
[PDF]
State v. David Gallagher
with which he was charged. Specifically, he claimed that he did not understand what he baldly asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4527 - 2017-09-19
with which he was charged. Specifically, he claimed that he did not understand what he baldly asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4527 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
N.W.2d 923. ¶5 Rosemary’s complaint, filed July 11, 2008, asserted a breach of contract claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54635 - 2014-09-15
N.W.2d 923. ¶5 Rosemary’s complaint, filed July 11, 2008, asserted a breach of contract claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54635 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court did not make adequate findings of fact to support its decision. Second, he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141299 - 2015-05-05
that the circuit court did not make adequate findings of fact to support its decision. Second, he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141299 - 2015-05-05
State v. Jo A. Kain
of them, the claim fails. We affirm the judgment and orders of the trial court. ¶2 The arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2778 - 2005-03-31
of them, the claim fails. We affirm the judgment and orders of the trial court. ¶2 The arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2778 - 2005-03-31