Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26991 - 27000 of 29823 for des.
Search results 26991 - 27000 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
is a question of law we review de novo. CED Props., LLC v. City of Oshkosh, 2018 WI 24, ¶20, 380 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240834 - 2019-05-16
is a question of law we review de novo. CED Props., LLC v. City of Oshkosh, 2018 WI 24, ¶20, 380 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240834 - 2019-05-16
Shirley D. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee
is a question of law, which we review de novo. E.g., Stockbridge School Dist. v. Department of Pub. Instruction
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16940 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law, which we review de novo. E.g., Stockbridge School Dist. v. Department of Pub. Instruction
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16940 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 163
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that an appellate court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56883 - 2011-08-21
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that an appellate court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56883 - 2011-08-21
[PDF]
State v. Charles E. Hennings
reversal is a question of law, which we No. 00-3432-CR 4 review de novo. State v. Broomfield
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3408 - 2017-09-19
reversal is a question of law, which we No. 00-3432-CR 4 review de novo. State v. Broomfield
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3408 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI 41
the criteria for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81741 - 2014-09-15
the criteria for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81741 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s assistance was ineffective is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶16 Counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064707 - 2026-01-21
counsel’s assistance was ineffective is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶16 Counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064707 - 2026-01-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a legal determination that this court decides de novo. State v. Swinson, 2003 WI App 45, ¶57, 261 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625488 - 2023-02-21
a legal determination that this court decides de novo. State v. Swinson, 2003 WI App 45, ¶57, 261 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625488 - 2023-02-21
[PDF]
WI 59
. § 893.89. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. Rechsteiner v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51661 - 2014-09-15
. § 893.89. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. Rechsteiner v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51661 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 84
are questions of law that we review de novo. Phelps v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wis., Inc., 2009 WI 74, ¶36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176587 - 2017-09-21
are questions of law that we review de novo. Phelps v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wis., Inc., 2009 WI 74, ¶36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176587 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142363 - 2015-05-19
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142363 - 2015-05-19