Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26991 - 27000 of 29823 for des.
Search results 26991 - 27000 of 29823 for des.
CA Blank Order
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142363 - 2015-05-19
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142363 - 2015-05-19
Wangard Partners, Inc. v. Gerald Graf
and application to a set of facts present questions of law for de novo review). When we interpret a statute, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25241 - 2006-06-27
and application to a set of facts present questions of law for de novo review). When we interpret a statute, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25241 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
WI 41
the criteria for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81742 - 2014-09-15
the criteria for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81742 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Koepsell's Olde Popcorn Wagons, Inc. v. Koepsell's Festival Popcorn Wagons, Ltd.
decisions de novo, applying the same method employed by the trial court. Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6302 - 2017-09-19
decisions de novo, applying the same method employed by the trial court. Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6302 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Kurt Hallin v. John Hallin
of proof is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Higginbotham, 110 Wis.2d 393, 402
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13224 - 2017-09-21
of proof is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Higginbotham, 110 Wis.2d 393, 402
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13224 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law which [an appellate] court approaches de novo without deference to the court[] below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164952 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law which [an appellate] court approaches de novo without deference to the court[] below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164952 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. If, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29347 - 2014-09-15
the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. If, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29347 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Cory L. Horsfall
deficient performance and prejudice are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Tulley, 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4643 - 2017-09-19
deficient performance and prejudice are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Tulley, 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4643 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 205
review a trial court’s conclusions of law de novo. City of Muskego v. Godec, 167 Wis. 2d 536, 545
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29962 - 2014-09-15
review a trial court’s conclusions of law de novo. City of Muskego v. Godec, 167 Wis. 2d 536, 545
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29962 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel is a determination subject to de novo review. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73905 - 2014-09-15
of counsel is a determination subject to de novo review. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73905 - 2014-09-15