Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26991 - 27000 of 70090 for hi.
Search results 26991 - 27000 of 70090 for hi.
Darla J.S. v. Jesus G.
denying his motion to reopen a paternity judgment. The issue is whether the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11927 - 2005-03-31
denying his motion to reopen a paternity judgment. The issue is whether the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11927 - 2005-03-31
State v. Troy Petrauski
his plea of no contest.[1] Petrauski appeals from the order denying his suppression motion and from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15618 - 2005-03-31
his plea of no contest.[1] Petrauski appeals from the order denying his suppression motion and from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15618 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tyree Goodrich
PER CURIAM. Tyree Goodrich appeals judgments, entered upon his no contest pleas, convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7316 - 2005-03-31
PER CURIAM. Tyree Goodrich appeals judgments, entered upon his no contest pleas, convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7316 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nathaniel L. Douglas
denying his motion for plea withdrawal and sentence modification.[1] The issues are whether Douglas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26205 - 2006-08-14
denying his motion for plea withdrawal and sentence modification.[1] The issues are whether Douglas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26205 - 2006-08-14
State v. Lyle W. Jourdan
appeals from judgments and orders denying his motion to modify his sentence based upon the enhanced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10492 - 2005-03-31
appeals from judgments and orders denying his motion to modify his sentence based upon the enhanced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10492 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joeval M. Jones
stated that he was voluntarily dismissing his appeal in this case pursuant to Wis. Stat. ยง (Rule) 809.18
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16501 - 2005-03-31
stated that he was voluntarily dismissing his appeal in this case pursuant to Wis. Stat. ยง (Rule) 809.18
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16501 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of his right to respond, but he has not done so. After reviewing the no-merit report and conducting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99709 - 2014-09-15
of his right to respond, but he has not done so. After reviewing the no-merit report and conducting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99709 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
an order denying his sentence modification motion as procedurally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33534 - 2014-09-15
an order denying his sentence modification motion as procedurally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33534 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and informed of his right to file a response but he has not done so. Upon consideration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118589 - 2014-09-15
of the report and informed of his right to file a response but he has not done so. Upon consideration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118589 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Roeschen was informed of his right to file a response, but he has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159241 - 2017-09-21
. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Roeschen was informed of his right to file a response, but he has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159241 - 2017-09-21