Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26991 - 27000 of 57216 for id.
Search results 26991 - 27000 of 57216 for id.
[PDF]
State v. Timothy Ziebart
is limited to determining whether the trial court erroneously exercised this discretion. See id. at 320 n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2700 - 2017-09-19
is limited to determining whether the trial court erroneously exercised this discretion. See id. at 320 n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2700 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on an issue of discretion.” Id. B. Sufficient Explanation ¶15 RENEW concedes that the legislature granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170908 - 2017-09-21
on an issue of discretion.” Id. B. Sufficient Explanation ¶15 RENEW concedes that the legislature granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170908 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” Id. Whether a plea was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered is a question
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256683 - 2020-03-16
.” Id. Whether a plea was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered is a question
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256683 - 2020-03-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the surcharge is not punishment and is not a direct consequence of the plea. See id., ¶12. Consequently
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219631 - 2018-09-20
the surcharge is not punishment and is not a direct consequence of the plea. See id., ¶12. Consequently
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219631 - 2018-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Jamerrel Everett
affirmed the court of appeals decision. See id. at 614, 453 N.W.2d at 898. After reviewing the language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14846 - 2017-09-21
affirmed the court of appeals decision. See id. at 614, 453 N.W.2d at 898. After reviewing the language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14846 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and that the deficient performance prejudiced her. See id. at 687. If this court concludes that Molly has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=802286 - 2024-05-14
and that the deficient performance prejudiced her. See id. at 687. If this court concludes that Molly has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=802286 - 2024-05-14
2009 WI APP 51
the court is not at liberty to disregard the plain, clear words of the statute.” Id., ¶46 (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35716 - 2009-05-11
the court is not at liberty to disregard the plain, clear words of the statute.” Id., ¶46 (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35716 - 2009-05-11
State v. Wilton Tye
, however, that the good faith exception has parameters[31]. Id. at ¶¶36, 64, 66. In Leon, the United
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17589 - 2005-03-31
, however, that the good faith exception has parameters[31]. Id. at ¶¶36, 64, 66. In Leon, the United
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17589 - 2005-03-31
Erin O'Brien v. Badger Bowl, Inc.
there is no evidence as to the length of time the condition existed. See id. at 35-38 & n.6, 264 N.W.2d at 576-78 & n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8986 - 2005-03-31
there is no evidence as to the length of time the condition existed. See id. at 35-38 & n.6, 264 N.W.2d at 576-78 & n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8986 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for the court’s decision. Id. ¶19 We conclude that Amanda Gonzalez’s testimony was not relevant to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32170 - 2008-03-19
for the court’s decision. Id. ¶19 We conclude that Amanda Gonzalez’s testimony was not relevant to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32170 - 2008-03-19