Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 271 - 280 of 45080 for Cost-effective.
Search results 271 - 280 of 45080 for Cost-effective.
[PDF]
NOTICE
estimated it would cost $151,899.39 to repair the heavily damaged unit, and $15,818.37 for the smoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52935 - 2014-09-15
estimated it would cost $151,899.39 to repair the heavily damaged unit, and $15,818.37 for the smoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52935 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
company. Clean-Works estimated it would cost $151,899.39 to repair the heavily damaged unit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52935 - 2010-08-02
company. Clean-Works estimated it would cost $151,899.39 to repair the heavily damaged unit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52935 - 2010-08-02
Diane S. Burns v. Melvin G. Schroepfer
that Burns in effect used the rationale in Weinhagen, arguing that the costs incurred for an attorney were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13439 - 2005-03-31
that Burns in effect used the rationale in Weinhagen, arguing that the costs incurred for an attorney were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13439 - 2005-03-31
WI 10 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Notice This order is subject to further editing and...
. No. 12-10 In the matter of amendment to Supreme Court Rule 22.24 Relating to Costs Assessments
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92038 - 2013-01-22
. No. 12-10 In the matter of amendment to Supreme Court Rule 22.24 Relating to Costs Assessments
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92038 - 2013-01-22
[PDF]
WI 10
. No. 12-10 In the matter of amendment to Supreme Court Rule 22.24 Relating to Costs Assessments
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92038 - 2014-09-15
. No. 12-10 In the matter of amendment to Supreme Court Rule 22.24 Relating to Costs Assessments
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92038 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 10
. No. 12-10 In the matter of amendment to Supreme Court Rule 22.24 Relating to Costs Assessments
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92038 - 2014-09-15
. No. 12-10 In the matter of amendment to Supreme Court Rule 22.24 Relating to Costs Assessments
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92038 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
, issued a report recommending a 60-day suspension plus restitution and costs. ¶3 The OLR filed a second
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46419 - 2010-01-26
, issued a report recommending a 60-day suspension plus restitution and costs. ¶3 The OLR filed a second
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46419 - 2010-01-26
2010 WI 4
, issued a report recommending a 60-day suspension plus restitution and costs. ¶3 The OLR filed a second
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46444 - 2010-01-26
, issued a report recommending a 60-day suspension plus restitution and costs. ¶3 The OLR filed a second
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46444 - 2010-01-26
[PDF]
WI APP 88
) did not take effect until January 1, 2014, two days after she committed the crime, the change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151271 - 2017-09-21
) did not take effect until January 1, 2014, two days after she committed the crime, the change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151271 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
be reinstated. We further direct Attorney Gamino to pay the costs of the reinstatement proceeding, which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30176 - 2007-09-04
be reinstated. We further direct Attorney Gamino to pay the costs of the reinstatement proceeding, which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30176 - 2007-09-04