Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 271 - 280 of 82865 for case search.
Search results 271 - 280 of 82865 for case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
and signature block: The warrant in this case, though entitled “Search Warrant” and bearing the signature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40933 - 2009-09-14
and signature block: The warrant in this case, though entitled “Search Warrant” and bearing the signature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40933 - 2009-09-14
State v. Marty R. Caban
of the warrantless search branch of the law. Professor LaFave concludes that the line of cases from Chambers v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7838 - 2005-03-31
of the warrantless search branch of the law. Professor LaFave concludes that the line of cases from Chambers v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7838 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Marty R. Caban
of federal case law approves warrantless searches of mobile automobiles if probable cause exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7838 - 2017-09-19
of federal case law approves warrantless searches of mobile automobiles if probable cause exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7838 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI 53
In the present case, we apply this two-step inquiry to determine whether the search of the passenger
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263864 - 2020-06-05
In the present case, we apply this two-step inquiry to determine whether the search of the passenger
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263864 - 2020-06-05
State v. Wilton Tye
statement to support the search warrant in this case is a technical irregularity not affecting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17589 - 2005-03-31
statement to support the search warrant in this case is a technical irregularity not affecting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17589 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 166
. The holding in this case does not create a bright line rule, which will justify a home search every time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34310 - 2014-09-15
. The holding in this case does not create a bright line rule, which will justify a home search every time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34310 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI App 166
the premises was. Id., ¶35. Whereas in the instant case, the search warrant was considerably narrower
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34310 - 2008-11-11
the premises was. Id., ¶35. Whereas in the instant case, the search warrant was considerably narrower
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34310 - 2008-11-11
State v. Robert F. Hart
whether arrest comes before or after the search. In this case, however, no arrest was going to occur
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2642 - 2005-03-31
whether arrest comes before or after the search. In this case, however, no arrest was going to occur
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2642 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert F. Hart
the search. In this case, however, no arrest was going to occur at the time of the search. Therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2642 - 2017-09-19
the search. In this case, however, no arrest was going to occur at the time of the search. Therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2642 - 2017-09-19
State v. Bonny Treutelaar
the denial of her motion to suppress evidence seized during a warrantless search of an automobile in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11688 - 2005-03-31
the denial of her motion to suppress evidence seized during a warrantless search of an automobile in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11688 - 2005-03-31