Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 271 - 280 of 9541 for jurors.
Search results 271 - 280 of 9541 for jurors.
State v. Dale L. Smith
postconviction motion. Smith contends that the trial court erred in refusing to strike for cause a juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7608 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion. Smith contends that the trial court erred in refusing to strike for cause a juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7608 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dale L. Smith
-2035-CR 2 strike for cause a juror, Charlotte T., who works as an administrative assistant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7608 - 2017-09-19
-2035-CR 2 strike for cause a juror, Charlotte T., who works as an administrative assistant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7608 - 2017-09-19
State v. David D. Masini
. He contends that the trial court erred when it decided not to dismiss a juror for cause. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13181 - 2005-03-31
. He contends that the trial court erred when it decided not to dismiss a juror for cause. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13181 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David D. Masini
that the trial court erred when it decided not to dismiss a juror for cause. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13181 - 2017-09-21
that the trial court erred when it decided not to dismiss a juror for cause. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13181 - 2017-09-21
State v. Fredrick E. Jones
juror and when it allowed the sheriff’s department to add deputies to the courtroom. Because we discern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19803 - 2005-10-03
juror and when it allowed the sheriff’s department to add deputies to the courtroom. Because we discern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19803 - 2005-10-03
COURT OF APPEALS
, presentencing discussion with the jurors was not plain error. We therefore affirm the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137606 - 2015-04-08
, presentencing discussion with the jurors was not plain error. We therefore affirm the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137606 - 2015-04-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, presentencing discussion with the jurors was not plain error. We therefore affirm the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137606 - 2017-09-21
, presentencing discussion with the jurors was not plain error. We therefore affirm the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137606 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an allegedly unfair and biased juror, Juror 3. Jelks additionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967483 - 2025-06-10
an allegedly unfair and biased juror, Juror 3. Jelks additionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967483 - 2025-06-10
State v. Larry D. Harris
disappointed” by the delay because there were “50 jurors sitting over in Jury Management,” and suggested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13898 - 2005-03-31
disappointed” by the delay because there were “50 jurors sitting over in Jury Management,” and suggested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13898 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Larry D. Harris
that it was “extremely disappointed” by the delay because there were “50 jurors sitting over in Jury Management
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13898 - 2014-09-15
that it was “extremely disappointed” by the delay because there were “50 jurors sitting over in Jury Management
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13898 - 2014-09-15