Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 271 - 280 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 271 - 280 of 12912 for prosecuting.
State v. Jesse H. Swinson
defendants charged with drug crimes, he had no protection against being prosecuted in both federal and state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4934 - 2005-03-31
defendants charged with drug crimes, he had no protection against being prosecuted in both federal and state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4934 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jesse H. Swinson
that, unlike defendants charged with drug crimes, he had no protection against being prosecuted in both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4935 - 2017-09-19
that, unlike defendants charged with drug crimes, he had no protection against being prosecuted in both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4935 - 2017-09-19
State v. Kenneth A. Roberts
high degree of prejudice; (3) the prosecution improperly commented on Roberts’ silence during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15931 - 2005-03-31
high degree of prejudice; (3) the prosecution improperly commented on Roberts’ silence during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15931 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Derrick Stewart
, as a party to the crime, after a trial by jury. The prosecution charged that Stewart had ordered a gang
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11970 - 2017-09-21
, as a party to the crime, after a trial by jury. The prosecution charged that Stewart had ordered a gang
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11970 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dennis L. Farr
jeopardy, that this was a vindictive and retaliatory prosecution, and that the trial court should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11495 - 2017-09-19
jeopardy, that this was a vindictive and retaliatory prosecution, and that the trial court should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11495 - 2017-09-19
State v. Dennis L. Farr
and retaliatory prosecution, and that the trial court should have modified his fifteen-month prison sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11495 - 2005-03-31
and retaliatory prosecution, and that the trial court should have modified his fifteen-month prison sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11495 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
clearly failed to show that bar owners are being singled out for prosecution among similarly situated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140335 - 2017-09-21
clearly failed to show that bar owners are being singled out for prosecution among similarly situated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140335 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
offense is factually a third offense, a crime, which only the State can prosecute. Lowery contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134414 - 2017-09-21
offense is factually a third offense, a crime, which only the State can prosecute. Lowery contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134414 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
postconviction motion for resentencing. He argues that the prosecution breached the plea agreement when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30097 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion for resentencing. He argues that the prosecution breached the plea agreement when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30097 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2006AP1826-CRAC Cir. Ct. No. 2006CF621
Amendment states in relevant part: “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27550 - 2014-09-15
Amendment states in relevant part: “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27550 - 2014-09-15