Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 271 - 280 of 60098 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 271 - 280 of 60098 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a defective deed. Nonetheless, the circuit court’s order also dismissed that claim. JBCB appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205023 - 2017-12-14
of a defective deed. Nonetheless, the circuit court’s order also dismissed that claim. JBCB appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205023 - 2017-12-14
Linda Hanson v. Jerry Christensen
. BRUNNER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 CANE, C.J.[1] Jerry Christensen appeals a small claims judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19375 - 2005-08-22
. BRUNNER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 CANE, C.J.[1] Jerry Christensen appeals a small claims judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19375 - 2005-08-22
[PDF]
Linda Hanson v. Jerry Christensen
Christensen appeals a small claims judgment of $250. The judgment represents Christensen’s share
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19375 - 2017-09-21
Christensen appeals a small claims judgment of $250. The judgment represents Christensen’s share
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19375 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ralph W. Hutchens, Sr. v. Daniel R. Simonson
The Hutchenses claim they own the entire island and argue the circuit court erred by (1) placing the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7495 - 2017-09-20
The Hutchenses claim they own the entire island and argue the circuit court erred by (1) placing the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7495 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the description in the LeDuc Deed, tied solely to the NE 1/4 of Section 16.” The Heberts do not claim on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131444 - 2017-09-21
to the description in the LeDuc Deed, tied solely to the NE 1/4 of Section 16.” The Heberts do not claim on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131444 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to the description in the LeDuc Deed, tied solely to the NE 1/4 of Section 16.” The Heberts do not claim on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131444 - 2014-12-09
to the description in the LeDuc Deed, tied solely to the NE 1/4 of Section 16.” The Heberts do not claim on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131444 - 2014-12-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of closing, Mednikow also drafted a quit-claim deed, real estate transfer return, corporate consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89671 - 2014-09-15
of closing, Mednikow also drafted a quit-claim deed, real estate transfer return, corporate consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89671 - 2014-09-15
George Dufield v. Tom McCormick
claims he established exclusive ownership of the access by adverse possession. Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7478 - 2005-03-31
claims he established exclusive ownership of the access by adverse possession. Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7478 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the Bank via the sheriff’s deed.5 Consequently, Pilecky claims that McCarty retained the authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362613 - 2021-05-04
to the Bank via the sheriff’s deed.5 Consequently, Pilecky claims that McCarty retained the authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362613 - 2021-05-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
241. Here, the Solises claim a mutual mistake between Sackett and Johnson in the 1967 deed creating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36615 - 2014-09-15
241. Here, the Solises claim a mutual mistake between Sackett and Johnson in the 1967 deed creating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36615 - 2014-09-15