Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 271 - 280 of 58338 for speedy trial.
Search results 271 - 280 of 58338 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of custody” of evidence presented at trial; Dobbins’ speedy trial rights were violated; trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959044 - 2025-05-20
of custody” of evidence presented at trial; Dobbins’ speedy trial rights were violated; trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959044 - 2025-05-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of custody” of evidence presented at trial; Dobbins’ speedy trial rights were violated; trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959044 - 2025-05-20
of custody” of evidence presented at trial; Dobbins’ speedy trial rights were violated; trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959044 - 2025-05-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to trial within 180 days after he made his speedy trial request, as required by the Interstate Act
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186406 - 2017-09-21
to trial within 180 days after he made his speedy trial request, as required by the Interstate Act
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186406 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, Anderson claimed: his constitutional speedy trial right was violated; he was denied the right to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56911 - 2010-11-22
, Anderson claimed: his constitutional speedy trial right was violated; he was denied the right to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56911 - 2010-11-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
. In that appeal, Anderson claimed: his constitutional speedy trial right was violated; he was denied the right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56911 - 2014-09-15
. In that appeal, Anderson claimed: his constitutional speedy trial right was violated; he was denied the right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56911 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. At a scheduling conference held off the record on July 2, 2015, Jenkins invoked his speedy trial right, meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214490 - 2018-06-19
. At a scheduling conference held off the record on July 2, 2015, Jenkins invoked his speedy trial right, meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214490 - 2018-06-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 17, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of ...
for the following reasons: (1) failing to file a speedy trial demand; (2) failing to adequately communicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101921 - 2013-09-16
for the following reasons: (1) failing to file a speedy trial demand; (2) failing to adequately communicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101921 - 2013-09-16
[PDF]
State v. Thomas W. Koeppen
right to due process of law and a speedy trial. He also contends that it was error to admit “other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2760 - 2017-09-19
right to due process of law and a speedy trial. He also contends that it was error to admit “other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2760 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Charles E. Snodgrass
by probable cause, whether his right to a speedy trial was violated, and whether he was properly sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4163 - 2017-09-20
by probable cause, whether his right to a speedy trial was violated, and whether he was properly sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4163 - 2017-09-20
State v. Timothy A. Washburn
to determine whether there are any issues which have arguable merit. Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. Speedy Trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11420 - 2005-03-31
to determine whether there are any issues which have arguable merit. Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. Speedy Trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11420 - 2005-03-31