Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2701 - 2710 of 58247 for speedy trial.
Search results 2701 - 2710 of 58247 for speedy trial.
State v. Joseph P. Sutherland
his conviction; (2) the trial court erred by allowing the jury to hear opinion testimony given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2554 - 2005-03-31
his conviction; (2) the trial court erred by allowing the jury to hear opinion testimony given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2554 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Smith argues that the trial court erred when it found that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164274 - 2017-09-21
motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Smith argues that the trial court erred when it found that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164274 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Christopher L. Berry
a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. We affirm the order denying his motion. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4697 - 2017-09-19
a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. We affirm the order denying his motion. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4697 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jessie L. Fitzl
. No. 01-0284-CR 2 order denying his postconviction motion. Fitzl claims: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3564 - 2017-09-19
. No. 01-0284-CR 2 order denying his postconviction motion. Fitzl claims: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3564 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The issues are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion by declining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27307 - 2014-09-15
. The issues are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion by declining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27307 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 5, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
modification. The issues are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27307 - 2006-12-04
modification. The issues are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27307 - 2006-12-04
[PDF]
Rick Montgomery v. Carl J. Mahler
. Before Cane, P.J., LaRocque and Myse, JJ. PER CURIAM. Edward and Elizabeth Berndt, as trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8957 - 2017-09-19
. Before Cane, P.J., LaRocque and Myse, JJ. PER CURIAM. Edward and Elizabeth Berndt, as trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8957 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 32
of a child, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 948.02(2)(2005-06).1 Rhodes claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31233 - 2014-09-15
of a child, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 948.02(2)(2005-06).1 Rhodes claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31233 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Debbie A. Ramos
that the trial court did not misuse its discretion in either respect, we affirm. In November 1992, Ramos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11448 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court did not misuse its discretion in either respect, we affirm. In November 1992, Ramos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11448 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
the judgment and order a new trial.1 The issue is whether trial counsel failed to investigate and present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35052 - 2014-09-15
the judgment and order a new trial.1 The issue is whether trial counsel failed to investigate and present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35052 - 2014-09-15