Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2701 - 2710 of 20937 for word.
Search results 2701 - 2710 of 20937 for word.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. If the words’ common and ordinary meaning is clear, we simply apply the ordinance to the facts using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35412 - 2014-09-15
. If the words’ common and ordinary meaning is clear, we simply apply the ordinance to the facts using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35412 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Anton F. Schorsch v. James Blader
is capable of more than one meaning, this court will determine legislative intent from the words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10752 - 2017-09-20
is capable of more than one meaning, this court will determine legislative intent from the words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10752 - 2017-09-20
State v. Joshua T. Howard
the words, “reasonable” and “doubt,” in a pocket dictionary, and had shared the dictionary definitions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6577 - 2005-03-31
the words, “reasonable” and “doubt,” in a pocket dictionary, and had shared the dictionary definitions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6577 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thao Lor
in the instruction, Lor argues that “[t]he erroneous inclusion of the word ‘or’ meant that the jury could find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13519 - 2005-03-31
in the instruction, Lor argues that “[t]he erroneous inclusion of the word ‘or’ meant that the jury could find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13519 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CVW v. Lawrence M. Stress
N.W.2d 759, 761 (1978). In other words, “the first in time is the first in right.” United States v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15062 - 2017-09-21
N.W.2d 759, 761 (1978). In other words, “the first in time is the first in right.” United States v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15062 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for strategic reasons because he did not want to call “extra attention” to those words. Counsel also said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53151 - 2010-08-10
for strategic reasons because he did not want to call “extra attention” to those words. Counsel also said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53151 - 2010-08-10
COURT OF APPEALS
and words that the defendant used support this charge; that he threw a shoe at Elesha, a box fan was thrown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90233 - 2012-12-10
and words that the defendant used support this charge; that he threw a shoe at Elesha, a box fan was thrown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90233 - 2012-12-10
2006 WI APP 217
proof. Id. at 1013-15 (noting no “magic words” are required to have the requisite grant of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26459 - 2006-10-30
proof. Id. at 1013-15 (noting no “magic words” are required to have the requisite grant of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26459 - 2006-10-30
[PDF]
WI APP 23
by the parties. However, the parties do not differ on the wording, and we have confirmed the previous wording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134011 - 2017-09-21
by the parties. However, the parties do not differ on the wording, and we have confirmed the previous wording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134011 - 2017-09-21
Toumkham Rabideau v. Milan W. Stiller
the omission is called to the attention of the pleader or the movant.” (Emphasis added.) In other words, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25694 - 2006-07-25
the omission is called to the attention of the pleader or the movant.” (Emphasis added.) In other words, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25694 - 2006-07-25