Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27011 - 27020 of 33970 for dismissed.
Search results 27011 - 27020 of 33970 for dismissed.
State v. Aurelio Magdariaga
that the money be returned to him and that the charges against him be dismissed. He also asked that his attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10991 - 2005-03-31
that the money be returned to him and that the charges against him be dismissed. He also asked that his attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10991 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 5, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
for the plea, the State would dismiss the habitual criminality enhancer originally attached to the battery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27319 - 2006-12-04
for the plea, the State would dismiss the habitual criminality enhancer originally attached to the battery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27319 - 2006-12-04
COURT OF APPEALS
] Reynolds also moved to dismiss the case for want of prosecution, because the criminal complaint had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95505 - 2013-04-15
] Reynolds also moved to dismiss the case for want of prosecution, because the criminal complaint had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95505 - 2013-04-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael J.K.
hearing, the juvenile court dismissed count one and found Michael delinquent on counts two and three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15909 - 2017-09-21
hearing, the juvenile court dismissed count one and found Michael delinquent on counts two and three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15909 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to dismiss the repeater enhancer and battery charge. The parties jointly recommended a time-served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73674 - 2011-11-14
to dismiss the repeater enhancer and battery charge. The parties jointly recommended a time-served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73674 - 2011-11-14
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Clay F. Teasdale
dismissal, and for failing to cooperate with BAPR's investigation. ¶3 In February 2005, Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19616 - 2017-09-21
dismissal, and for failing to cooperate with BAPR's investigation. ¶3 In February 2005, Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19616 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
no contest pleas to the two felony charges at issue in exchange for the dismissal of five other felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55527 - 2014-09-15
no contest pleas to the two felony charges at issue in exchange for the dismissal of five other felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55527 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
statute. The Village moved for summary judgment, seeking dismissal of all claims under WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257448 - 2020-04-15
statute. The Village moved for summary judgment, seeking dismissal of all claims under WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257448 - 2020-04-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the State’s case, the prosecutor dismissed the burglary charge, but the jury found Stokes guilty of all six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170585 - 2017-09-21
of the State’s case, the prosecutor dismissed the burglary charge, but the jury found Stokes guilty of all six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170585 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of burglary and one count of theft. The remaining counts were dismissed and read in “for purposes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246764 - 2019-09-17
of burglary and one count of theft. The remaining counts were dismissed and read in “for purposes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246764 - 2019-09-17