Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27011 - 27020 of 58950 for quit claim deed.

State v. Richard A. M.
assault of the same child and from an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21520 - 2006-02-22

_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
, except to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84691 - 2012-07-08

State v. Jody L. Stehle
no contest he waived review of a potential conflict of interest claim. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12389 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 14, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
trial.[1] Hawkinson claims that he was entitled to a jury trial because he raised affirmative defenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28045 - 2007-02-13

[PDF] State v. Dale Gould, Jr.
an order denying his postconviction motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. Gould argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2406 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
will not support a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Id. at 464-65. ¶9 In analyzing an ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33123 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Carl G. Nordholm v. Herlache Industrial Supply Co., Inc.
to this valuation, claiming Schenck did not use appropriate valuation methods. Nordholm commenced this action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5239 - 2017-09-19

Brown County Dept. of Human Services v. Laurie and Loonie M.
Laurie and Loonie’s first claim is that the circuit court erred when it failed to take testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24734 - 2006-04-10

[PDF] State v. Stacy L. Blunt
and 939.641, STATS. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11680 - 2017-09-19

Rawson Contractors, Inc. v. Lisbon Sanitary District No. 1
. Rawson also claimed that it was entitled to the additional $2 per lineal foot because the district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7911 - 2005-03-31