Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27021 - 27030 of 69479 for as he.
Search results 27021 - 27030 of 69479 for as he.
State v. Jose G.
to locate Mr. G[.] since his release from incarceration, I believe that was in March [of 1995]. QAnd he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10894 - 2005-03-31
to locate Mr. G[.] since his release from incarceration, I believe that was in March [of 1995]. QAnd he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10894 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The trial court held that Holiday was immune from personal liability because there was no evidence that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166278 - 2017-09-21
The trial court held that Holiday was immune from personal liability because there was no evidence that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166278 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ernest J.P., Jr.
and outpatient treatment. He argues that his commitment hearing was defective because the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7128 - 2017-09-20
and outpatient treatment. He argues that his commitment hearing was defective because the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7128 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. §§ 943.10(1m)(a), 939.05 and 939.32 (2007–08).1 He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91312 - 2014-09-15
. §§ 943.10(1m)(a), 939.05 and 939.32 (2007–08).1 He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91312 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jessie L. Stokes
an order denying his motion for sentence modification. He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26400 - 2006-09-06
an order denying his motion for sentence modification. He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26400 - 2006-09-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case, he was on probation in an earlier case, Grant County case No. 2019CM206, for violating WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456559 - 2021-11-24
in this case, he was on probation in an earlier case, Grant County case No. 2019CM206, for violating WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456559 - 2021-11-24
[PDF]
State v. Steven W. Gauerke
identifies several specific gaps in the prosecution’s case that he believes destroyed his plea’s factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11455 - 2017-09-19
identifies several specific gaps in the prosecution’s case that he believes destroyed his plea’s factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11455 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
required under § 767.325(1), STATS., because he failed to show that the modification was necessary because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7910 - 2017-09-19
required under § 767.325(1), STATS., because he failed to show that the modification was necessary because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7910 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
appraiser.[2] ¶3 Walker explained that as part of the revaluation process he evaluated all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141859 - 2015-05-18
appraiser.[2] ¶3 Walker explained that as part of the revaluation process he evaluated all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141859 - 2015-05-18
COURT OF APPEALS
provided ineffective assistance of counsel during voir dire. He contends on appeal that the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73239 - 2011-11-02
provided ineffective assistance of counsel during voir dire. He contends on appeal that the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73239 - 2011-11-02