Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27021 - 27030 of 58546 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Clifford W. Neal
assault, as a party to the crime, §§ 940.225(2)(a) and 939.05, STATS. The trial court accepted the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8086 - 2017-09-19

State v. Mohammad R. Abu-Saif
, because he failed to present that argument to the trial court. We also decline to address Abu‑Saif’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11770 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
trial, the court concluded in a written order for judgment and judgment of dismissal that Gray failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100888 - 2013-08-14

COURT OF APPEALS
and trial counsel to establish the defendant’s understanding, documentary evidence and transcripts of prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37679 - 2009-07-21

[PDF] State v. Jonathan Owens
asserts the trial court failed to adequately explain why it denied his request for ERP eligibility. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21652 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Daniel T.
register as a sex offender pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 301.45. Daniel contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6444 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Kimberly K. Larsen v. School District of Rhinelander
Companies (hereafter “the school district”), appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12997 - 2017-09-21

State v. Karim H. Scott-Newson
). The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in not granting Scott-Newson’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5964 - 2005-03-31

City of Sturgeon Bay v. Eric A. Friehe
vehicle with a prohibited blood alcohol content.[1] The City contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11452 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael E. Wilson
and the legal authority to do so. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11549 - 2005-03-31