Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27021 - 27030 of 38537 for t's.
Search results 27021 - 27030 of 38537 for t's.
COURT OF APPEALS
, the Clinic contends, “[t]here is no support in the medical records” for the statements the Commission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104774 - 2013-11-25
, the Clinic contends, “[t]here is no support in the medical records” for the statements the Commission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104774 - 2013-11-25
State v. Daniel Aguilar
of identification is not hearsay if “[t]he declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12114 - 2005-03-31
of identification is not hearsay if “[t]he declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12114 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. See Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639, 653 (1990) (stating that in making their decisions, “[t]rial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=777747 - 2024-03-20
. See Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639, 653 (1990) (stating that in making their decisions, “[t]rial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=777747 - 2024-03-20
State v. Jose Soto
Garcia, 192 Wis.2d at 862, 532 N.W.2d at 117. “[T]he burden is on the defendant to offer a fair and just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14353 - 2005-03-31
Garcia, 192 Wis.2d at 862, 532 N.W.2d at 117. “[T]he burden is on the defendant to offer a fair and just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14353 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
(“[T]o establish that postconviction or appellate counsel was ineffective, a defendant bears the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89199 - 2006-01-30
(“[T]o establish that postconviction or appellate counsel was ineffective, a defendant bears the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89199 - 2006-01-30
State v. Saturnino R. Guerra-Reyna
system.... ... [O]ver 150 years ago, Alexis de Tocqueville remarked: "[T]he institution of the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7748 - 2005-03-31
system.... ... [O]ver 150 years ago, Alexis de Tocqueville remarked: "[T]he institution of the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7748 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
intrusion was “de minimis” because “[t]he driver is being asked to expose to view very little more of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108799 - 2014-03-10
intrusion was “de minimis” because “[t]he driver is being asked to expose to view very little more of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108799 - 2014-03-10
Patrick Hart v. Meadows Apartments
thereon.” Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2). “[T]he question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7054 - 2005-03-31
thereon.” Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2). “[T]he question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7054 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eric S. Fenz
procedure: [T]he trial judge [should] sentence for the gross amount that he concludes, in his discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4014 - 2005-03-31
procedure: [T]he trial judge [should] sentence for the gross amount that he concludes, in his discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4014 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
received a jury trial on the first special verdict question, the court concluded: [T]here would be no error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66812 - 2012-02-29
received a jury trial on the first special verdict question, the court concluded: [T]here would be no error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66812 - 2012-02-29