Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27031 - 27040 of 69439 for as he.

State v. David E. Williams
. Stat. § 974.06 (1999-2000) motion.[1] Williams claims that: (1) he was denied the effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4450 - 2005-03-31

City of Wautoma v. Richard A. Wehe
arrest was not based on probable cause and that the sobriety tests he performed are not probative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15050 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jose G.
to locate Mr. G[.] since his release from incarceration, I believe that was in March [of 1995]. QAnd he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10894 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Barron County v. Brian T.
. appeals an order setting the amount of child support for each of his five children. He argues that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4620 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. David E. Williams
. No. 01-2665 2 that: (1) he was denied the effective assistance of counsel; (2) he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4450 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Tammy J. Erdmann
a light-colored jacket, appeared to be crying. When Christianson reached Main Street he saw Erdmann
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5917 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Gerald R. Fogle
of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19889 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Ralph W. Hutchens, Sr. v. Daniel R. Simonson
Hutchens 2 received sole ownership of land that included the island. When he died in 1946, the land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7495 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the revaluation process he evaluated all of the Village’s seventy-eight waterfront properties, eleven of which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141859 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Ernest J.P., Jr.
and outpatient treatment. He argues that his commitment hearing was defective because the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7128 - 2017-09-20