Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27041 - 27050 of 40042 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 27041 - 27050 of 40042 for financial disclosure statement.
Debra A. Maki v. Kathleen W. Allen
just at the end of the tenancy period. The court also considered Maki’s statement that she terminated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4715 - 2005-03-31
just at the end of the tenancy period. The court also considered Maki’s statement that she terminated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4715 - 2005-03-31
Tony Walker v. Gary McCaughtry
, 1996. Walker admitted to a slightly different version of the statement, that being “if we did play
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11944 - 2005-03-31
, 1996. Walker admitted to a slightly different version of the statement, that being “if we did play
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11944 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Shawn D. Knapp
court was concerned about Knapp's statement to a psychologist reported in the Presentence Investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7753 - 2017-09-19
court was concerned about Knapp's statement to a psychologist reported in the Presentence Investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7753 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a sentencing hearing. After reviewing the PSI, victim impact statements, and letters submitted to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078981 - 2026-02-17
a sentencing hearing. After reviewing the PSI, victim impact statements, and letters submitted to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078981 - 2026-02-17
Craig Langsdorf v. Michael Hoefferle
was inadmissible hearsay. It was an out-of-court statement offered for the truth of the matter asserted. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12384 - 2005-03-31
was inadmissible hearsay. It was an out-of-court statement offered for the truth of the matter asserted. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12384 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Anthony D. Turner
statements to police corroborated April’s story. Turner presented two witnesses in his defense. One
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12893 - 2017-09-21
statements to police corroborated April’s story. Turner presented two witnesses in his defense. One
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12893 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and recite his version of the defendant’s incriminating statements. Seemingly, Gissall is arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131932 - 2014-12-22
and recite his version of the defendant’s incriminating statements. Seemingly, Gissall is arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131932 - 2014-12-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
argument, that the court erred in admitting recorded statements of two witnesses who were unavailable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206305 - 2017-12-26
argument, that the court erred in admitting recorded statements of two witnesses who were unavailable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206305 - 2017-12-26
[PDF]
State v. Demitrus L. Mayweather
below, the no merit report contains a correct statement of the law governing these issues and properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12612 - 2017-09-21
below, the no merit report contains a correct statement of the law governing these issues and properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12612 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
entirety. This conclusion was apparently based upon our statement in Krizan I that “we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239914 - 2019-04-30
entirety. This conclusion was apparently based upon our statement in Krizan I that “we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239914 - 2019-04-30