Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27051 - 27060 of 29823 for des.
Search results 27051 - 27060 of 29823 for des.
State v. George Toland Ziedonis
). The application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law, and we decide it de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19809 - 2005-12-11
). The application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law, and we decide it de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19809 - 2005-12-11
State v. Bart C. Gruetzmacher
review de novo. State v. Davison, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d 145, 666 N.W.2d 1. See also State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16689 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. State v. Davison, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d 145, 666 N.W.2d 1. See also State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16689 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Interpretation ¶19 We apply de novo review to a circuit court’s order granting a motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30345 - 2007-09-19
Interpretation ¶19 We apply de novo review to a circuit court’s order granting a motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30345 - 2007-09-19
Spriggie Hensley v. Jeffrey P. Endicott
presents an issue of statutory construction. We review questions of statutory construction de novo. State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16349 - 2005-03-31
presents an issue of statutory construction. We review questions of statutory construction de novo. State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16349 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. If, however, “‘the defendant fails to allege sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29347 - 2007-06-11
. This is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. If, however, “‘the defendant fails to allege sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29347 - 2007-06-11
[PDF]
WI APP 74
of law that we review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d 179, 709 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83484 - 2014-09-15
of law that we review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d 179, 709 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83484 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Scott Brunson v. Robert L. Ward
reviews de novo. Katze v. Randolph & Scott Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 116 Wis. 2d 206, 212, 341 N.W.2d 689
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17456 - 2017-09-21
reviews de novo. Katze v. Randolph & Scott Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 116 Wis. 2d 206, 212, 341 N.W.2d 689
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17456 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. George Toland Ziedonis
, and we decide it de novo without deference to the trial court’s decision. See State v. Guzman, 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19809 - 2017-09-21
, and we decide it de novo without deference to the trial court’s decision. See State v. Guzman, 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19809 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 62
. STAT. § 66.0413. ¶11 Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195412 - 2018-08-23
. STAT. § 66.0413. ¶11 Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195412 - 2018-08-23
[PDF]
WI APP 135
a summary judgment de novo, but apply the same methodology as the circuit court. Tews v. NHI, LLC, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89676 - 2014-09-15
a summary judgment de novo, but apply the same methodology as the circuit court. Tews v. NHI, LLC, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89676 - 2014-09-15