Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27051 - 27060 of 29828 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
conduct constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=891296 - 2024-12-17

[PDF] State v. Bruce A. Owen
review this issue de novo. State v. Pheil, 152 Wis.2d 523, 530, 449 N.W.2d 858, No. 95-2631-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9715 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Frontsheet
Code. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Noffke ex rel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236872 - 2019-04-25

[PDF] Gordon J. Grube v. John L. Daun
of law is presented which we review de novo. ¶21 Restatement (Second) § 520 lists six factors
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17055 - 2017-09-21

Kurt Hallin v. John Hallin
the proper burden of proof is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Higginbotham, 110 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13224 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is timely from a final judgment or order, both present questions of law that we review de novo.” Sanders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627795 - 2023-02-28

[PDF] Indiana Insurance Company v. Super Natural Distributors, Inc.
of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same methodology as the circuit court. M&I First Nat’l
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5463 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. If, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29347 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Frontsheet
conclusions of law on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Inglimo, 2007 WI 126, ¶ 5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724888 - 2024-03-01

Robert Pasko v. City of Milwaukee
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Paige K.B. v. Steven G.B., 226 Wis. 2d 210, 226-27, 594 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17546 - 2005-03-31